Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Preface <br /> <br />This analysis was produced by the staff of the Commission on Information Management <br />(IMC) through a standard process. This process is changed whenever an opportunity is <br />identified to improve fairness and accuracy. Each member of the staff reads the mate- <br />rial submitted by the department. The entire staff then meets to review the plan and <br />projects. One staff member is selected to take notes of this discussion, while continuing <br />. to participate actively in the discussion, and to produce a draft analysis. The review is a <br />very thorough and open evaluation of the department's submis-sion in the context of <br />previous plans and projects. The review follows a set of structured discussion points <br />approved by thc IMC. The published analysis that is produced from a series of drafts <br />does not represent the view of anyone staff member. It is the sum of the decisions <br />made collectively by the staff in an attempt to provide the best possible recommendation <br />to the Commissioners of the IMC. Final IMC recommendations are forwarded to the <br />Office of State Planning and Budgeting and the Joint Budget Committee for further ac- <br />, tion. <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources 9/6/96 <br /> <br />11 <br />