My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00832
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC00832
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:07:37 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:22:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.285
Description
Wild and Scenic - General
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
1/5/1984
Author
CWCB
Title
Status of Colorado Wild and Scenic River Studies - As of January 1984
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002455 <br /> <br />o Reasons for wanting the river in the system included a <br />desire to protect outstandingly remarkable scenery and <br />recreation, and a desire to stop construction of the dam <br />and reservoir. <br /> <br />Study Team Recommendation <br /> <br />The study team recommended the entire study area be included <br />in the National System. This would include 35 miles of river and <br />7,400 acres of adjacent land with the following classifications: <br /> <br />o Upper North Fork and entire South Fork, 17 miles of river <br />and 3,800 acres, classified as wild river area; <br /> <br />o Upper mainstem, Middle Fork, and lower North Fork. 12 <br />miles of river and 2,700 acres, classified as scenic <br />river area; and <br /> <br />o Lower main stem. 6 miles of river and 900 acres, <br />classified as recreational river. <br /> <br />See attached map for reach locations. <br /> <br />Impacts of Designation (from Study Report) <br /> <br />o County zoning or scenic easement acquisition would be <br />necessary along the lower main stem and lower North Fork <br />to protect river values. <br /> <br />o Access easements would be necessary. <br /> <br />o The potential Hinman Park Reservoir, on the lower main <br />stem, could not be developed. <br /> <br />o There would be an annual loss of 100,000 board feet of <br />timber. 0.1 man-year of employment, and $700,income. <br /> <br />o Seven-hundred recreation visitor-days more than current <br />use would have to be accommodated at a cost of $908,500. <br /> <br />o Approximately 5,300 acres would be withdrawn from mineral <br />entry. <br /> <br />current Legislation (S. 1084) <br /> <br />S. 1084 would eliminate approximately 6 miles of the lower <br />main stem recommended for designation as recreational river in <br />the final study report. This was done to eliminate the impacts <br />of designation on 545 acres of private lands and to allow <br />development of Hinman Park Reservoir. <br /> <br />bm <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.