My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00811
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC00811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:07:29 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:21:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River Basin General Publications - Augmentation-Weather Modification
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/13/1983
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
CREST - Colorado River Enhanced Snowpack Test - Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000110 <br /> <br />winter operational cloud seeding program; seeding storms passing over the <br />Sierra Nevada - including specially identified public lands such as <br />wilderness areas - without incident or indication of harmful environmental <br />effects or social inconvenience. <br /> <br />In the State of Colorado, the 5-year Climax I research program was initi- <br />ated in 1960 by Colorado State University. Climax II was conducted from <br />1965 to 1970. "These studies identified a potential snowpack increase of <br />between 10 and 20 percent when winter seeding was conducted under speci- <br />fied conditions." [15, p. 3]. The Colorado River Basin Pilot Project was <br />conducted by the Bureau of Reclamation in the San Juan Mountains from 1970 <br />to 1975. It confirmed the results of the Climax Studies. <br /> <br />An array of municipalities, counties, public utilities, ski areas, private <br />companies, water management organizations, and Indian tribes have con- <br />ducted operational wintertime cloud seeding in Colorado since 1972 under <br />permit from the State Department of Natural Resources. In drought peri- <br />ods, the State of Colorado has conducted a cloud seeding program [15]. <br /> <br />All these research and operational programs have been conducted safely, <br />without indication of harmful environmental effects. The information and <br />experience gained from these projects create a presumption in favor of the <br />ability of the Bureau to conduct a cloud seeding demonstration program in <br />any of the CRB subbasins in a safe and beneficial manner. <br /> <br />All investigations to date have concluded that incremental increases in <br />precipitation over the short terms of cloud seeding research and develop- <br />ment programs do not have significant adverse effects on various environ- <br />mental ecological sectors. The primary reason cited for this conclusion <br />is the fact that the incremental increases each year are well within <br />historic annual variations in precipitation. The San Juan Ecology Report <br />[14] found a large, natural annual variability of over 400 percent in <br />snowpack. As additional information and experience has accrued, estimates <br />of long-term impacts of precipitation enhancement have been moderated. <br />The complexity of this analysis question was recognized in 1977 by Howell: <br /> <br />"It has come to be recogn i zed that, in the sett i ngs so far <br />investigated, the potential disturbing effect of weather <br />modification is overwhelmed by other disturbances to the <br />status quo, some manmade and some natural. <br /> <br />"From this state of affairs, two broad conclusions are now <br />being drawn. First, since investigation of the points of <br />specific environmental impact thought to have the highest <br />potential for effects from weather modification has indicated <br />no clearly adverse effects, emphasis on hurry-up studies to <br />ward off imagined catastrophes, such as species extinctions, <br />no longer appears justified. Second, assessment of long-term <br />effects of weather modification on the environment as a whole <br />is assuming relatively greater importance, and means for such <br />assessment are under review." [16] <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />-~------ <br />---~~-~---~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.