Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />TABLE 2 - ECONOMIC ANALYSIS <br />(~oo-year period of analysis ~ 3Ij, interest) <br /> <br />( - .A:::t 1 <br />.-,0 <br />"'..11::1 <br />.00, <br />.;;; <br /> <br /> Annual <br /> Operation J <br /> Annual Maintenance Tota~ Annua.~ Benefit- <br /> , Investment Costs Amortization and Replacement Annual WateI' Saving Cost <br /> ~/ Cost Costs Cost Benef'its 2/ Ratio <br />Rio Grande $ 8,799,000 29B,100 120,000 418,100 1,128,000 2.70 . <br />Tributaries 6,648,300 225,200 82,000 307,200 720,000 2.34 <br />Rio Grande & Tributaries 15,447,300 523,300 202,000 725, 300 ~,848,000 2.55 <br />Rio Grande Restoration <br />of lower 12 miles j/ ~,489,000 50,400 20, 300 70,700 186,000 2.63 <br /> <br />\J) <br /> <br />!/ Inc~udes ~~neral property costs and interest during construction. <br />Y Based on :ji6O per acre-foot, the average value of irrigation ,water in Upper Rio <br />Grande Basin. <br />j/ From mouth of proposed Closed Basin Division Conveyance Channe~ to 4 miles be~ow <br />mouth of Conejos River. Costs and benefits inc~uded in va~ues shown above for' <br />total reach of Rio Grande. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />