WSPC00704 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . only for the water it supplies to the Upper Colorado River Basin, but also as a source of power and revenues for project repayment to the Federal Government. 4. The U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service has produced draft flow recommendations for the Gunnison River at Grand Junction (downstream of the Black Canyon) to benefit endangered fish in the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers. In order to meet the flow recommendations, the Aspinall Unit would need to be re-operated. The flow recommendations and NPS quantification are not totally compatible and combined significantly impact Colorado's ability to develop its Compact apportionment. Impacts of the Proposed NPS Ouantification of the Black Canvon Reserved Ril!ht The potential impact of the proposed quantification is illustrated on the NPS graphs attached to the application (difference between actual blue line and proposed green line). In short, the quantification seeks to control about 60% of all Gunnison River flows to and through the Park. Given the 1933 priority date already decreed the reserved right, the proposed quantification would greatly restrict operations at both Taylor Park and the Aspinall Units, and reduce the amount of water available to junior water right holders, unless terms and conditions are imposed through the quantification process that would limit the impacts. The potential impacts are as follows based on NPS data. . 1993 Wet Year (Forecasted April-July inflow 1,020,000 AF, Actual 985,300 AF) . Anytime Gunnison River flows through the Black Canyon, after allowing 1,000 cfs for the Gunnison Tunnel, exceed 3,000 cfs, water is bypassing the power plant at Blue Mesa and Crystal. Canyon flows in excess of 4,000 cfs result in power plant bypasses at all Aspinall hydropower plants. The lost power and power revenues ($2,000,000 or more in 1993) are significant. . Flows under current operations are beneficial to both the trout fishery and recreational boating. Under the proposed quantification, when flows exceed 1200 cfs or go below 500 cfs, they become less than desirable if not dangerous to recreational boating. . The high peaks that occurred in 1993 resulted in a poor year class of trout in the Gunnison River through the Black Canyon although not as bad as those in the even wetter years of 1983 and 84, which were the worst on record. The high peaks also result in lower reservoir levels, which adversely impact the lake fisheries. . The high peaks in and of themselves would not cause flooding in Delta. However, when the peak releases are added to other major tributary inflows downstream (e.g. the North Fork Gunnison), flooding in Delta is highly likely. Flooding at Delta likely results in some flooding at Grand Junction as well. . 1988 Dry Year (Forecasted April-July inflow 520,000 AF, Actual 389,900 AF) . Power impacts are still present, but not very significant. . Recreational boating and fish flows are less than acceptable. . Impacts to water users become very significant, with many water rights decreed in the 1940's unable to divert at all. Statements of Opposition to the quantification had to be filed by 03/31/2001. The State of Colorado (Water Conservation Board, Water Resources, and Division of Wildlife) along with approximately 350 other objectors have filed statements of opposition to the case. The State of Colorado wants this issue resolved and does not want the case withdrawn. A basin map, NPS hydrographs and proposed resolution of the Colorado Water Conservation Board concerning the Gunnison Basin issues can be obtained through the following link, htto:11 cwcb. state.co. us/agendaslMarch 01/25 f.odf. 2 002720