My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00681
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC00681
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:51:17 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:18:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.500.10
Description
Colorado River Basin-Water Quality-Salinity-Organizations and Entities-CO Dept of Public Health-WQCC
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/19/1980
Author
Gregory J Hobbs Jr
Title
Colorado River Salinity-Water Quality Control Commission-1978 Standards-Colorado Water Quality Law/Protection for Maximum Beneficial Use of Water Rights
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the Commission from displacing the water rights system by water <br />quality regulation. <br />B. The Point Source Permit System is the <br />Primary Regulato:t:y Method for Controlling <br />Pollution Under the State and Federal <br />Water Quality Acts; Water Diversion, <br />Conveyance and Storage Systems are not <br />Po~nt Sources of Pollution. <br />As expressed in the legislative declaration to the <br />Colorado Qater Quality Control Act, water quality control is <br />for the protection of "the legitimate and teneficial uses of <br />such waters." C.R.S. 1973, 25-8-102(2). Beneficial uses <br />identified by the Act are "public water supplies," "propagation <br />of wildlife and aquatic life," and "domestic, agricultural, <br />industrial and recreational uses." Id. <br />The fact that the State Act contains broad language <br />concerning the control of pollution does not mean that the <br />Water Quality Commission and Division have license to choose <br />the means for achieving that end. 'The State Act, like the <br />Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 55 1251 ~. <br />seq., is a discharge oriented Act focusing on control of <br />point sources of pollution. As stated by the United States <br />Supreme Court in Environmental Protection Agency v. California <br />State Water Resources Control Board, 426 U.S. 200, 203-205 (1976) <br />the pre-1972 Federal Water Quality Law was based upon "water <br />quality standards which were to serve both to guide performance <br />by polluters and to trigger legal action to abate pollution," <br />but this proved "ineffective" because ':.he "character of the <br />standards themselves" was the problem, in that water quality <br />standards "focused on the tolerable effects rather than the <br />preventable causes of water pollution." The 1972 amendments <br />introduced two major changes in the methods to set and en- <br />force standards to abate and control water pollution~ <br /> <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.