Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i~1 <br /> <br />.j <br /> <br />l!E:! <br /> <br />;u. <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />! 13. <br /> <br />: IS. <br />I <br /> <br />---.. <br /> <br />. 21. <br /> <br />: 22.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION <br /> <br />lo.flow-Hoovet' to Puk.e'l Dam <br /> <br />Evaporatioa--Laka Mohava <br /> <br />14. Evaporatloo--Lake Hav.au <br /> <br />Net Wacer Lo..--Hoover to Parker <br />(#11 - #12 + #13 + #14) <br /> <br />16. CAP Diversion <br /> <br />17. HWD Diversioo <br /> <br />18. Parker Release <br />(Also #10 - #15 - #16 - #17) <br /> <br />19. Depletloa--Parker to ImperIal <br /> <br />20. <br /> <br />Iaflov--Parker co ImperiAl <br /> <br />JANUARY <br />1981 <br />~ <br /> <br />(197) <br /> <br />DECEMBER <br />1984 DIFFERENCE <br />~ (CRSS-CRSF) <br /> <br />82 279 <br /> <br />/ <br />/ <br /> <br />....~..;.. . <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />Flow at Imperial <br />(#18 - #19 . #20) <br /> <br />Inflow Imperial to Mexico <br /> <br /> 193 193 <br /> 132 132 <br />421 LISa 29 <br />1,148 1,495 347 <br />708 726 18 <br />1.171 7.208 37 <br />906 898 (8) <br />(266) 27 293 <br /> <br />S,999 <br /> <br />6.337 <br /> <br />338 <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />. "- <br /> <br />162 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />(162) <br /> <br />/' <br /> <br />EXP~~ATORY ~OTES <br /> <br />T~e CkSP figure includes the effect of average evaporation lo..~. 00 <br />Lake Mobave and Lake 8av48u. ~ributary inflow, aad transit 10.... between <br />Hoover and Parker Dams. The CRSS figure includ.. 171,000 af of COQ'uapt1v~ <br />u.. by native vegetatIon, 4. veIl .a the avaras_ ~_acb ,alDa from , <br />Hoover Dam to Davis Dam. and from Dav!. Dam to larker Dam. lacludlQ& \,: <br />Bl1l Williams River Inflov. <br /> <br />The CRSP figure includes an estimate of future credit for the uD~e.$ured <br />reeurn flo~ of 130,000 af. This has the effect of reducing the Inflo~ <br />by th3t acount.. The CRSS figure includes 170.000 af of CODSu::lpti"Je ose by <br />native vesetutlon. and 61.000 af of operational loss for Senator ~&6h O~. <br />1n addition to the average reach gain of 258.000 at. <br /> <br />The CRSP figure includes an estimate of future credit for the uQ$~asured <br />return flo~ of 70,000 af. This has tha effect of reducing the Idflov by <br />that amou~t. The C~SS hydrologic data base does Dot extend below <br />Impe~lal Dam. so ther~ is no inflo~/outflow. <br /> <br />.23. , . Depletion Imperial to M~ieo 4,202 4.132 (70) The figures for both CRSP and CRSS are apparent averag. depletions <br /> computed by summing other known inflow and outflow. for the reach. IQ <br /> both cases the Qu~ber so derived agrees very closely with the .cheduled <br /> deuands averaged over the 1985 ~hrou&h 2040 period. <br /> . <br />24. Delivery to Mexico 1.959 2,205 246 <br /> (Also #21 + 122 - 123) <br /> <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />/ <br />/ <br />.-; <br /> <br />" <br /> <br /> <br />...,.,!!.---- <br /> <br />"If: ,.. <br />,,-~-lk...i <br /> <br /><:::> <br /><:::> <br />N <br />00 <br />C&J <br />-.l <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />iy <br />I <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />i <br />, <br />, <br />I <br />; <br /> <br />1 <br />