Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l1lJ28....5 <br /> <br />waters with three-phase service onSlte, This assumption may lead to a cost <br />overestimate for large waters, For e~ample. the set-up fee was included In the <br />cost to pump Detta Gravel P,t #1. <br /> <br />Minimum Charge <br />It was assumed a minimum pumping charge of $500 would be ,mposed for all <br />waters ~ 5,0 AF by any contractor. This assumptron may underestImate tl'le cost <br />of pumping, Contracton; may not find it economically worthwhile to' pump a small <br />pond for only $1500 (set up fee + mlnrmumcl1arge) . ~ <br />I- <br />Minimum Pool ". , <br />It w" ","m'" ," po", ",old be pom~"e:.., 'u.'" p;,~'b1 , ,~.'er"'e. <br />the cost of pumping was based on lhetu"'~l ~Iume In eacQ pond~This <br />resulted in an overestimation of reclamation cosJ; for Delta Gravel Pil #1 (see <br />Application of Calculations to Previously T ed W~s. Delta Gravel Pit #1) <br /> <br />E~.J,lI!lgin9-wi1h9Mt Three~.~$~lce Onsile . "- <br />Set.Up Fee ~... <br />A set-up fee ot $1500 was Inetu ed.Jn..thc~lculatlOns.of pumping cost on all <br />waters without three.phase s. ,e~ns'~,~j~~~umed the extra effort to <br />Install a ptatform to support diesel' enerator manpower to oversee a <br />generator-powered pump,L1)!} paratlO jUstifi~.this-{ssUmPlion. ThiS assumption <br />may lead 10 a cost oV1f:~lmate.f r large '1'hds and a cost underestimate for <br />small ponds. For la~, .pondsll e sel uP.a,fee was Included In the contract. so <br />adding on the set u ee results, a st"overestlmate. However. due to the <br />~.fr,;l commlFfm .~, anpowl a~e,gu ment by the contractor, as e~peneneed <br />durin he 2 4 Roa Pond r~'Jrion project. the contractor may feel Justified <br />4Iq.!n~~ing t Q se!.~. ee above, $1500 to make the effon required to pump <br />''''';'r~,M' '<;ally "hwh"e <br /> <br />Minimum Char~~, , , <br />~as ass~OCt 'a m!l:!imum pumping charge of S 1 000 would be imposed for all <br />waters ~ 5'O~AF.~Y.;pnY contractor, This assumption may underestimate the cost <br />01 pumping, Ttti!ictOI1l may not find II economically worthwhile to pump a small <br />pond for 0 S2500 (set up fee + minimum charge) considering the e~tra <br />COmml, of manpower and equipment (see 'set up fee- above), <br /> <br />MinImum Pool <br />... Jt waf'assumed all ponds would be pumped-down as lar as pOSSible. Therefore. <br />""'"!he cost of pumpmg was based on the full-pool volume In each pond ThiS <br />resulted in an overestimate of reclamation costs for 22 3/4 Road Pond (see <br />Application of Calculations to Previously Treated Waters - 22 3/4 Road Pond), <br />However. if a minimum pool of 12AF was assumed (as it was for chloMe/sodlum <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />6 <br />