My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00592
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC00592
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:50:48 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:16:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.H
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - UCRBRIP - Program Organization-Mission - Stocking
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/6/1997
Author
Anita Martinez
Title
Matrix for Evaluating and Estimating Treatment Costs for Removing Fish Populations from Ponds in the Gunnison and Colorado River Floodplains in Colorado - Draft - 11-06-97
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />u02So1 <br /> <br />lacking three-phase service ensile, a diesel powered generator was used 10 <br />pump 47 AF from 22 314 Road Pond at a cost of $11,790 or approximately <br />$251/AF. Hils cost was multiplied by the number of AF in each pond to obtain <br />a pumping cost A sel up lee of $1500 was then added to the pumping cost for <br />a final estimate (see ConSideration of Assumptions. Pumping without Three- <br />Phase Service Qnsile. Set Up Fee). For waters.! 5.0 AF a minimum pumping <br />charge of $1000 was assessed In addition to the set up fee (see Consideration <br />af Assumptions. Pumping without Three-Phase ServiCe Onsite - /l.1Inlmum <br />~..., <br />Charge). ... <br />" ... <br />Chlorine I Sodium Thiosulfate Detoltification with Pumping (without three-phase) <br />An average of the actual chemical cost at Della Gravel PLt 111 (S129fAF)and 22 <br />314 Road Pond ($l66/AF) was used as a sta"ndard l$1'48) for estimating.che'mical <br />costs to reclaim ponds in the Grand Valley:......hts standard waS"mun\phed by <br />estimated pond volume to obtain a chemical cost bstimate for each pond The <br />cost of pumping without three-phase servie&'OOsite ar:d Ule cost of labor was then <br />added to this chemical cost estimate to !btain a"llrmal e$umate of pumping and <br />treating ponds with chloTlnel~lum'"':Wiosullaie (se~ Conslderahon of <br />Assumptions" Labor Cost With ~,~ to C~m!Cal Appllcatlon), For ponds ~ <br />12 AF a ma.lmumchemlcal costo($1n6.($1481~F ~12 AF = $1776) was used <br />in the calculations {see CorulTderat,on. o~sumptiOns - MaXimum Chlonne ! <br />Sodium ThIOsulfate cost' For 'hdS < "'2.Ar" the estimated volume was <br />mulliplied by the sla~a che al cos!1$146IAFj to obtain the estimated <br />chemical cost {see Co 'eratlO Assum ifl'ons - Small Pond Chlonne I Sodium <br />Thiosulfate Cost <br /> <br />^ <br />Chlorlnc.lJOodiul'\l.!hlos Ifate Oetoxi cation without Pumping <br />~E&,mat~porJ'"VoIume'~s multiplied by the standard chemical cost ($1481AF; <br />see-above)lO obtaTnoan esll~ted chemlC3l cost for each pond The cost of labor <br />was Jhen,aa~d to tkis ~sti1"hated chemical cost to obtain the cosl oltreatlng <br />Fm~,M. with Mnne I sOOlumthlosullate. <br />WQrac.ue Scenarl <br />Cost" col7' <br />e.est Ca$,O-ScenarlQ <br />'a,!fne ~1kTes in this column are the lowest estimated cost found in the "Treatment <br />- <br />.... Cost" columns. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.