My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00578
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC00578
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 7:49:42 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:15:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8045
Description
Section D General Studies-Federal Projects-General
Date
12/1/1979
Title
Moon Lake Power Plant Project-Reports 1979-80-Position Statement on the Rangely Reservoir
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />_ _--1 <br /> <br />\V'L :o:,~;,~,:I,~~J~~.::~,~,',,;~/ · <br /> <br />June 27, 1979 <br /> <br />Dave Z1yler <br />ACtornev at Law <br />901 East Main Street <br />P.O. Box 986 <br />Rangely, Colorado 81648 <br /> <br />0242 <br /> <br />D",az: Dave: <br /> <br />,Enclose~, please find 2 copies of th~ Rangely Ope=ation st~dy <br />sl>o-,;ing. the effect on the propos,ed Rans;ely: ?r:oject by the se~ior <br />~iqhts upstream bei~g exer=isac. !~ orce= ~o ~a~a the $tudy <br />conclusive from 1963 to 1973, it was necessary to extracolate <br />f~ontheDavic E. Fle~ing study of future water de~an~s-for <br />the period between 1371-1978, since the fle~ing study is current <br />only.to 1970. Based on an available storag~ of 50,000 A.P. along <br />.~h .. c. h b "200 - '-1' I f <br />W~~~ a m~n~~~u ~~S~ yp:ss o~ czs anc ~ e~~n; s utur~ <br />upstre~~ oparation study, the Rangely res;~voir would .be recuced <br />bv 12,100 A.F. in the water vears 1977 a~d 1973. Since the <br />l~77-1978 season was the worst year on re~ord, this would i~~~cate <br />~~at'sufficient water ~ould have been available for all o~=vious <br />years of record p~ior to and inclujing iSiS. The enclose~ - <br />maps concur with the a~ove information. <br /> <br />Th~ ope~ation study was reworked, holding all the variables <br />except the 200 cfs bypass, which ~as chan;ec to 300 cis. Results <br />indicate that the Rangely Reservoir ~ould not have been able <br />~o meet the reservoir demands for a peri~d of 9 ~onths duri~g <br />1977-1978, if 300 cfs was the required bypass. . <br /> <br />~he o?eration study ~as a;ain.r~~~r~~d to ce~e~i~= what ~~~~~u~ <br />by~as- "'ould J."s~ ern~"Y Mho R"--"'l'/ R"'-"'-'--'''' ,- ''''~17-19~~ -,,= <br />:' ;:''''' ..... 1.0 ':-'_ l"... _ . _..'-:;_... _'::'__"~""_ -... -;I - '0. .....- <br />requi=ed bypass turn~d out to be a??~cxi~a~ely 243.crs6 <br /> <br />Assuming 16,000 A.F. from the Rangely Rese=~oir cc~plete1y <br />cons\':,::led and 80~ of the remainder of '"ate= ,.\s=1. ',;ill continue- <br />downs~=sam, approximately 33 cfs additional ~~~;= ~ill en~a= <br />Utah. With a minimum bypass of 200 cfs pl~s ~et~rn flow, the <br />total reaching Utah would be approxL"ately 233 cfs. With a ~ini~~~ <br />bypass of 249 cfs, the total would be 287 cfs. <br /> <br />In addition, to the operation study with the 200 cfs bypass and <br />50,003 A.F. depletion, please find a White'River 3asin map <br />sho~ing th~ upstream wat~r ri;hts, senior to the Ra~gely ?rojec~, <br />that ~are operated in the Fle~i~g Report. <br /> <br />J150HIWli;;150 <br /> <br />p, o. 80X 571 <br /> <br />GRA.....O jU.\'CTlO,'/, COLOR.J~O 3: 5.;1 <br /> <br />ilJ;.;~~= 2.._.-j2':~ <br /> <br /> <br />Attached also. is en excerpt from that're?o"t. ~d Currier ~ill <br />fol1c~ up later with ~ore infc=~~tic~ as re~~i=~d~ <br /> <br />,-,..:; \. <br />, \'~ <br />'- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.