My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00516
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSPC00516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:50:13 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:14:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.H
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - UCRBRIP - Program Organization-Mission - Stocking
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/16/1996
Author
DOI-FWS
Title
Procedures for Stocking Non-Native Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin - Draft - 08-16-96
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />002679 <br /> <br />Co7orado River Basin 1993-1994 (Irving and Burdick 1995); Levee <br />Remova7 Strategic P7an (Lentsch et al. 1996); Genetics Management <br />Guidelines (Williamson and Wydoski (1994); Genetics Management P7an <br />. (Wydoski 1995) and annual propagation plans prepared in accordance <br />with this Plan; Augmentation P7an for the Razorback Sucker in the <br />Midd7e Green River 1996-1997 (Wydoski 1996); Stocking P7an for <br />Razorback Sucker in the Upper Co7orado and Gunnison Rivers (Burdick <br />et al. 1995); and all future stocking plans prepared through the <br />Program. <br /> <br />11. Ponds are considered to be outside a designated floodplain if they <br />are naturally above the floodplain in question or if they lie in <br />the floodplain in question but have FEMA approved dikes <br />functionally separating the pond from the floodplain. <br /> <br />12. Concurrent with implementing these stocking procedures. the <br />Recovery Program will conduct a peer-review study to evaluate the <br />effectiveness of the Interagency Standardized Monitoring Program <br />(ISMP) to detect changes in the survivability and/or abundance of <br />. -routinely stocked fish. Unless the study demonstrates that the <br />ISMP is effective for tracking nonnative fishes. a program would <br />have to be implemented to do so. If it is determined. by peer <br />review analysis by the respective State and the Service. that <br />nonnative fish escapement is occurring from an approved location. <br />then routine stocking of that species in that location would be <br />discontinued. Subsequent stockings at that location would then <br />require case-by-case review by the State wildlife agency and the <br />Fish and Wildlife Service (until the escapement problems are <br />corrected) to ensure that escapement has been adequately addressed. <br /> <br />IV. ROUTINE STOCKING OF NONNATIVE FISHES THAT ALREADY OCCUR AND ARE MANAGED <br />IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN <br /> <br />1. Nonnative fish species that occur and are managed by stocking in <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin can be routinely stocked (i.e. are <br />not subject to procedures outlined in Section IX) in the <br />locations/situations identified within this section. Stocking of <br />nonnative fish species in these locations/situations are considered <br />to be consistent with recovery of the endangered fishes. <br />Explanations and rationale for stocking of fish species and <br />terms/acronyms (Appendix B) are provided. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.