My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00493
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSPC00493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:50:06 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:13:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.100.10
Description
Colorado River - Interstate Litigation - Arizona Vs California
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/3/1963
Title
AZ Vs CA - Determination of Rights of States of the Lower Colorado River Basin to Waters of the Main Stream of the Colorado River - Opinion of the Supreme Court of the US - RE AZ Vs CA
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002178 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA. <br /> <br />the growing needs of the basin. The natural flow of the <br />Colorado was too erratic, the river at many places in <br />canyons too deep, and the engineering and economic <br />hurdles too great for small farmers, larger groups, or even <br />States to build storage dams, construct canals, and install <br />the expensive works necessary for a dependable year- <br />round water supply. Nor were droughts the basin's only <br />problem; spring floods due to melting snows and seasonal <br />storms were a recurring menace, especially disastrous in <br />California's Imperial Valley where, even after the Mex- <br />ican canal provided a more dependable water supply, the <br />threat of flood remained at least as serious as before. <br />Another troublesome problem was the erosion of land <br />and the deposit of silt which fouled waters, choked irriga- <br />tion works, and damaged good farm land and crops. <br />It is not surprising that the pressing necessity to trans- <br />form the erratic and often destructive flow of the Colorado <br />River into a controlled and dependable water supply <br />desperately needed in so many States began to be talked <br />about and recognized as far more than a purely local <br />problem which could be solved on a farmer-by-farmer, <br />group-by-group, or even state-by-state basis, desirable as <br />this kind of solution might have been. The inade- <br />quacy of a local solution was recognized in the Report of <br />the All-American Canal Board of the United, States <br />Department of Interior on July 22, 1919, which detailed <br />the widespread benefits that could be expected from <br />construction by the United States of a large reservoir on <br />the mainstream of the Colorado and an all-American <br />canal to the Imperial Valley.. Some months later, May <br />18, 1920, Congress passed an Act offered by Congressman <br />Kinkaid of Nebraska directing the Secretary of the <br />Interior to make a study and report of diversions which <br /> <br />· Department of Interior, Report of the All-American Canal Board <br />(1919), 23-33. The three members /of.. the Board 'were engineers <br />with long experience in Western water problems. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.