My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00493
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSPC00493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:50:06 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:13:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.100.10
Description
Colorado River - Interstate Litigation - Arizona Vs California
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/3/1963
Title
AZ Vs CA - Determination of Rights of States of the Lower Colorado River Basin to Waters of the Main Stream of the Colorado River - Opinion of the Supreme Court of the US - RE AZ Vs CA
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002220 <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />ARIZONA v. CALIFOltNIA. <br /> <br />The Government, on behalf of five Indian Reservations <br />in Arizona, California, and Nevada, asserted rights to wa- <br />ter in the mainstream of the Colorado River."' The <br />Colorado River Reservation, located partly in Arizona and <br />partly in California, is the largest. It was originally <br />created by an Act of Congress in 1865,98 but its area was <br />later increased by Executive Order."9 Other reservations <br />were created by Executive Orders and amendments to <br />them, ranging in dates from 1870 to 1907.'90 The Master <br />found both as a matter of fact and law that when the <br />United States created these reservations or added to them, <br />it reserved not only land but also the use of enough water <br />from the Colorado to irrigate the irrigahle portions of <br />the reserved lands. The aggregate quantity of water <br />which the Master'held was reserved for all the reservations <br />is about 1,000,000 acre-feet, to be used on around 135,000 <br />irrigable a'cres of land. Here, as before the Master, Ari- <br />zona argues that the United States had no power to make <br />a reservation of navigable waters after Arizona became a <br />State; that navigable waters could not be reserved by <br />Executive Orders; that the United States did not intend <br />to reserve water for the Indian Reservations; that the <br />amount of water reserved should be measured by the rea- <br /> <br />9' The Reservations were Chemehuevi, Cocopah, Yuma, Colorado <br />River, and Fort Mohave. <br />98 Act of March 3, 1865, 13 Stat. 541, 559. <br />99 See Executive Orders of November 22, 1873, November 16, <br />1874, and May 15, 1876. See also Executive Order of November <br />22, 1915. These orders may be found in 1 U. S. Dept. of Interior, <br />Executive Orders Relating to Indian Reservations ~7 (1912); 2 id" <br />at 5-6 (1922). <br />100 Executive Orders of January 9, 1884 (Yuma), September 19, <br />1890 (Fort Mohave), February 2, 1911 (Fort Mohave), September <br />27, 1917 (Cocopah). For these orders, see 1 id" at 12-13, 63-64 <br />(1912); 2 id., at 5 (1922). The Chemehuevi Reservation was estab- <br />lished by the Secretary of Interior on February 2, 1907, pending <br />congressional approval. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.