My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00250
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSPC00250
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:48:41 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:02:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.285
Description
Wild and Scenic - General
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
9/25/1985
Author
CWCB
Title
Issues Concerning Wild and Scenic River Designations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0024.)7 <br /> <br />o the impacts on vested water rights and on future <br />changes in these water rights: <br /> <br />o the ~pact of attracting additional people to the area; <br />and <br /> <br />o . the impact on road construction and maintenance. <br /> <br />Study Team Recommendation <br /> <br />Four alternatives were considered in the study process which <br />ranged from no action to designation of all eligible reaches of <br />the river. The study team' s preferred alternative was one which <br />would provide for the designation of 25.6 miles (8,192 acres) as <br />wild river on the North Fork, Middle Fork, El Rito Azul, and the <br />South Fork of the Conejos River and 13.2 miles (4,224 acres) as <br />recreational river on the Conejos River from Platoro Reservoir to <br />the confluence with the South Fork. The lower reach of the <br />mainstem from the confluence with the South Fork to the Highway <br />17 bridge was not recommended for designation. See the attached <br />map for the recommended designations by reach. <br /> <br />Impacts of Designation (from Study Report) <br /> <br />o wild river areas would be withdrawn from mineral entry. <br />Recreational river areas would remain available for <br />entry with the exception of existing withdrawals. <br /> <br />o Water quality and the existing diversity of fish and <br />wildlife habitat would be maintained. <br /> <br />o Cultural resources would be protected. <br /> <br />o Recreational use would increase at a rate of five <br />percent annually. <br /> <br />o Federal water and power projects would not be permitted <br />without specific congressional approval. <br /> <br />o Acquisition of easements on private land was not <br />anticipated . <br /> <br />o Access for fire suppression would be non-motorized <br />and/or by air for wild river areas, and non~motorized, <br />motorized, and/or by air for recreational river areas. <br /> <br />o Livestock grazing would continue at 2,535 animal unit <br />months, <br /> <br />o A potential timber harvest of 29,000 board feet <br />annually from recreational river areas would be <br />allowed. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.