My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00151
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSPC00151
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:48:17 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 1:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.400
Description
Colorado River Basin - Basin Briefing Documents-History-Correspondence
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/1997
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rule Making for Offstream Storage of Colorado River Water and Interstate Redemption of Storage Credits in the Lower Division States - Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0011% <br /> <br />No Action Alternative <br /> <br />Under the No Action Alternative the proposed rule would not be implemented and there would <br />be no Federal undertaking to impact cultural resources. Arizona and California entities may <br />construct off stream storage facilities for their own needs that could impact cultural resources. <br />The State entities would be the action agencies and consult with SHPO's through established <br />State procedures. It is possible that off stream storage credits could be developed between <br />California and Nevada for interstate redemption purposes without the proposed rule. <br />Reclamation would initiate the Section 106 process and consult with the SHPO on a case-by- <br />case basis. <br /> <br />LC Region DEAl I <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />12197 <br /> <br /> <br />4. Indian Sacred Sites <br /> <br />Reclamation is required, to the extent practicable, permitted by law, and not clearly inconsistent <br />with essential agency functions, to avoid adversely affecting the physical integrity ofIndian <br />sacred sites and to allow access by Indian religious practioners to such sacred sites (Executive <br />Order 13007). <br /> <br />Preferred Alternative <br /> <br />Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would not have adverse impacts on Indian sacred <br />sites or access tD such sites. There would be no change in current conditions in relationship to <br />this issue. <br /> <br />No Action Alternative <br /> <br />It is possible that off stream storage credits could be developed between California and Nevada <br />for interstate redemption purposes without the proposed rule. Reclamation would address this <br />issue in an appropriate NEP A document for such actions on a case-by-case basis. <br /> <br />5. Environmental Justice <br /> <br />Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income <br />Populations (Executive Order 12898) was signed on February 11, 1994 and amended on <br />January 30, 1995. In general, Federal agencies shall make achieving environmental justice part <br />of their missions by identifYing and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and <br />adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on <br />minority populations and low-income populations in the United States and its territories and <br />possessions. <br /> <br />In accordance with Executive Order 12898 and Reclamation policy (pEP-No. ECM 95-3), all <br />NEPA documents shall consider the impacts of Federal actions on minority and low-income <br />populations and communities, as well as the equity of the distribution of benefits and risks of <br />those actions. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.