Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ - .' "~o~l <br />~.: '" I.>, .) <br />I) L. .' A'~ ... <br /> <br />The Brownell Task Force and the Mexican Salinity Problem: <br />A Narrative Chronology of Events <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Seventeen years ago this summer, in June 1974, President Nixon signed into law <br />P.L. 93-320, the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act. Title I of the Act <br />authorized the Federal government to take measures to eliminate the effects of <br />brackish return flows (or drainage) from the Wellton-Mohawk irrigation project <br />on water delivered to Mexico under a 1944 treaty allocating the waters of the Rio <br />Grande, Tijuana, and Colorado Rivers between the U.S. and its southern neighbor. <br />At the heart of the Title I program was a 100 million Ilallon-per-dat (m~c:l) <br />desalting plant to be built at a site near Yuma, Arizona. The desalting p ant was <br />to be the solution to a water quality dispute that had periodically troubled <br />U.S.-Mexican relations since 1961. <br /> <br />The Yuma Desalting Plant was to remove 90 percent of the dissolved salts from <br />the return flows, by a process called reverse osmosis. This desalted water was then <br />to be blended with the remaining drainage to yield water of the quality guaranteed <br />Mexico under a 1973 Minute to the original treaty, Minute No. 242. The <br />- estimated capital cost of the plant, along with other measures called for in Title <br />I, was estimated at slightly under $100 million at the time of authorization. <br /> <br />Completion of the plant is now thirteen years behind the original schedule. Its <br />capital cost has risen to more than $400 million, and projected yearly operation <br />and maintenance costs from $10 to $33 million. The blended waters to be <br />delivered to Mexico may cost as much as $500 per acre-foot to produce.! <br /> <br />Why did the Federal government choose such a costly-and risky-means to <br />implement an international agreement? To answer that question, we must look <br />at the history of that decision-the people involved, their perspectives and <br />limitations, the courses of action they believed were available, and the constraints <br />under which they worked. But first, what was the problem they were solving-or <br />thought they were solving? <br /> <br />Emergence of the Salinity Issue <br /> <br />. ~~ <br /> <br />The treaty that guaranteed Mexico 1.5 million acre-feet of Colorado River water <br />annually "from any and all sources" did not specify its salinity. The salinity of <br />water used for irrigation water is often critical to agricultural productivity, as high <br />concentrations of salt reduce crop yields and may preclude the growing of salt- <br />sensitive crops such as tomatoes and lettuce. Because Mexico used-and still <br /> <br />brownell,rpt <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Seplem~r !99! <br />