My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00146
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSPC00146
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:48:16 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 1:58:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8062
Description
Federal Water Rights - Colorado Litigation - National Forest ISF Claims - Division 2
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
2/28/1995
Title
Materials of Interest - Greenback Cutthroat Trout Recovery Plan - Final Greenback Cutthroat Trout Recovery Team Submission - Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OD2D32 <br /> <br />blood-red over the lower sides and ventral region, especially in mature <br />males. Although a genetic basis exists to express characteristic color <br />patterns, the actual manifestation of color intensity and pattern depends <br />upon age, sex, and diet" (see Figure 1). <br /> <br />A summary of meristic characteristics for various Colorado subspecies of Q. <br />clarki (=Salmo clarki) are provided in Figure 3. <br /> <br />Although there is a close relationship between greenbacks and Colorado River <br />cutthroat trout, recent mitochondrial DNA studies indicate that both the <br />Arkansas River and South Platte River greenbacks are more closely related to <br />each other, than to populations of Colorado River cutthroat. Greenbacks from <br />the Arkansas and South Platte River drainages are nearly identical in DNA <br />fraqment patterns (Proebstel 1993). However, because of the geographic <br />separation of the drainages, greenbacks from the two drainages should not be <br />mixed for ~estoration purposes. <br /> <br />Since greenback cutthroat trout hybridize with other species and subspecies of <br />Oncorhvnchus, populations can range phenotypically from "essentially pure" to <br />obvious hybrids. The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) has adopted a <br />rating system developed by Binns (1977) as a means of rating population <br />purity. Each population is assigned a letter ranging from A (pure) to C <br />(obvious hybrids). <br /> <br />Only Type A populations are considered for recovery purposes in this plan <br />(Tables 1-4). However, known type Band C greenback populations (Table 5) are <br />also included in hopes that information obtained from research on types A <br />through C populations will be of value in formulating management plans for all <br />cutthroat trout subspecies. <br /> <br />Currsnt Distribution <br /> <br />The greenback cutthroat trout currently occurs in 51 sites that total 100 <br />hectares of lakes and 146 kilometers of stream habitat in the upper <br />"tributaries of the South Platte and Arkansas river drainages. Nine "historic" <br />populations remain that have been identified through recovery efforts <br />conducted since 1973. Pure greenbacks have been introduced into 42 additional <br />streams and lakes within the species historic range (as described in Objective <br />2, part II of the Recovery section). <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.