Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2374 <br />a crop consumptive use of 4.02 acre-feet per acre, derived from the <br />1974 cropping pattern for the Reservation. <br />Water Supply Optimization <br />Conveyance System Efficiency. In 1974, the distribution system <br />was operated with an apparent efficiency of 72.5 percent, where <br />operational waste was 13.3 percent of the gross diversion, and seep- <br />age plus evaporation was 14.1 percent. <br />In order to determine the maximum distribution system efficiency <br />attainable, the operation of several projects in the Yuma area was <br />examined. The lined distribution system of the Wellton-Mohawk <br />Irrigation and Drainage District seems to provide the best example. <br />Records indicate that it is operated at an efficiency of between 89 <br />percent and 92 percent while serving about 65,000 irrigated acres. <br />Two smaller systems that have a combination of lined laterals and <br />buried pipe laterals have higher efficiencies--the Yuma Irrigation <br />District serving about 10,000 acres has loss and waste of only 3 to 4 <br />percent, and the Yuma Mesa Project serving about 20,000 acres has <br />system loss and waste of only 6 to 8 percent. <br />Based on these examples, it is estimated that the Reservation's <br />distribution system could attain an 88 percent operating efficiency if <br />all canals were lined and operational waste were reduced to the un- <br />avoidable minimum. Using information from the 1974 operation, it is <br />estimated that operational waste could be reduced from 13.3 percent <br />to 7 percent. Thus the progression of conveyance system efficiency <br />improvement would be: <br /> <br />System efficiency in 1974 <br /> <br />72.5 percent <br /> <br />System efficiency with operational <br />waste reduced to 7 percent <br /> <br />79 <br /> <br />percent <br /> <br />System efficiency with operational <br />waste at 7 percent and with all <br />laterals lined <br /> <br />88 <br /> <br />percent <br /> <br />In order to reduce operational waste to a minimum, it will be <br />necessary to develop a more precise water scheduling procedure on <br />the project. Greater coordination will be needed between orders for <br /> <br />25 <br />