Laserfiche WebLink
<br />22 <br /> <br />acid from the shatte<ed batteries posed a threat to fish and other <br />aquatic life bul did nol reach the creek. according to officials of <br />Chemical Hmd1ing Corp. The company planned to remove <br />approximately 2.700 cubic yards of dirt and place il md the bagged <br />batteries in lined drums for transport to an out-of-state site. <br /> <br />Source: Rocky Mounlain News 9130191 <br /> <br />Tiger Team to Study Claims of Los Alamos Contamination <br /> <br />A 15().membet panel from the U,S, Departmenl of Enetgy has <br />gathered at Los Alamos National Laboratory to investigate whether <br />radioactive material from the lab has contaminated the comnl\m.ity. <br />The so~alled Tiger Team will review monitoring records and other <br />data to see whether the nuclear bomb complex allowed deadly <br />plutonium and other contaminants to reach the Rio Grande and <br />other water courses. At the same time, the Energy Department is <br />fmancing a $400,000 epidemiological study to detennine whether <br />the large number of brain tumors in the area is statistically <br />significant and whether it can be attributed to one cause. The study <br />is separate from that of the Tiger Team. <br /> <br />Source: Denvet POSI 9(29191 <br /> <br />State Fines Coors for PoIlullng <br /> <br />The Colorado Departmenl of Health has fined Coors Blewing Co, <br />$211,000 for discharges into Clear Creek, Coors was fmed <br />$175.000 for repeatedly discharging metcury, lead. copper, and <br />silvet into the creek, md $36,000 fOI a 150,OOO,gallon beer spill <br />lasl May thaI killed m estimated 13.000 fish in Clear Creek. <br />Because of its water quality problems. Coors began operating a new <br />$3 million treatment plml in April which il said enabled the <br />brewery to meet state pollution limits for the past five months, <br />exclusive of the May beer spill, <br /> <br />In addition. Coors agteed to pay a $700,000 penalty levied by the <br />Denver regional EPA office for violating federal hazardous,wasle <br />laws, Coors agreed to the penalty withoul admilting or denying my <br />liability, EPA officials said Coors knew it illegally discharged at <br />least two industrial solvents into the gtoundwater from 1981 to <br />1984. bUI failed to report il to the agency until 1990, The pollution <br />was !raced to leaky pipes beneath the company's container planl, <br />Coors has leplaced the pipes. bul an estimated 1.300 pounds of the <br />solvents TCA and PeE lemain in the soil beneath the planl, Coors <br />plans to clean up the contamination by 1994, <br /> <br />Source: DenVet Post 1013191, 10/4191; Rocky Mountain News <br />1013191 <br /> <br />WETLANDS <br /> <br />Groundwater Trust Awarded Wetlands Grant <br /> <br />The American Ground W ater TlUs~ in cooperation with the <br />Audubon Society of New Hampshire. has received a gtml from the <br />U,S, Enviromnental Protection Agency to produce a booklel <br />describing the hydrological relationships between wetlands and <br />groundwater in the United Slates, Case studies of wetlands <br />throughoul the nation will illustrate the.. relationships in diffeteDl <br />geological and geomorphological settings md climatic conditions, <br />The dynamic nature of the hydrological system md the effects of <br /> <br />T~ . . . i. ;:' .. <br />..... '...."'-: \wI_.. <br /> <br />OIUlual climatic variability on wetlands and ground water will be <br />emphasized. Any suggestions concerning case sb.1dies or <br />perspectives which could be included in "Ground Water and <br />Wetlands in the United States." may be sent to the Trust's offices, <br />The booklel is scheduled for completion by mid-I992. <br /> <br />Source:POUNTS.Fall 1991 <br /> <br />Experts Say Wetlands Denaltlon Unscientific; Study Suppressed <br /> <br />Govenunenl experts involved in regulating wetlands have described <br />the Bush adntinis!ration's proposed redefmition of the tenn <br />"wetlands" as unworkable and scientifically unsOlmd. based on a <br />nationwide field test. The documents summarizing the test program <br />and containing the criticism have been barred from release by the <br />White House but were obtained by the Associated Press. The <br />sharpest criticism was leveled at a proposed requirement that an <br />area must be saturated for 21 consecutive days or immdated with <br />water for 15 consecutive days to qualify as a wetland These <br />requirements. along with a new definition of a growing season and <br />criteria on wetland vegetation. would leave thousand of acres of <br />legitimate wetlmds unptolected, the experts said, Tesl results from <br />around the country indicate that the new definition would reduce <br />wetlands acreage. In some regions. from 30 percent to 80 percent <br />of acreage currently classified as wetlands would lose its protection. <br /> <br />The analyses include views from experts at the Army Corps of <br />Engineers. the EP A, and the Fish and Wildlife Service. Membets <br />of a wetlands task force on the White House Domestic Policy <br />Council. which played a key role in crafting the new defmition, <br />have argued that only the raw data documents. not the analyses. <br />should be available to the public. <br /> <br />The period for public conunent on the proposed new guidelines <br />ends Decembet 15, <br /> <br />Source: Denvet Post 1\122191 & 11/17191. Fl Collins Coloradoan <br />11(24191, Rocky Mounlain News 11(24191 <br /> <br />WesterD States Examine Proposed RedeflnllloD <br /> <br />Controversy over the effect of the Bush Administration' s proposed <br />redefinition of wetlands is sweeping several states. In Colorado. the <br />redefinition would remove about 50 percent of the wetlands <br />currently so classified. according to Gene Reetz of the EP A and <br />wetlands scientist David Cooper of Colorado State University. But <br />Ray Christensen of the Colorado Farm Bureau said it is unfair for <br />farmers to pay property taxes on land that becomes economically <br />worthless as soon as it is federally defined as a wetland. Steve <br />Dougherty, a consultanl for ERO Resources of DenVet, which has <br />represented some of the state's wetlands developers. argued that a <br />proper wetlmds policy should have two parts, The flrsl part would <br />create a scientific defmition of wetlands and the second part would <br />require politicians to decide when protection should be applied to <br />those defIDed areas. <br /> <br />In Nebtaska, the redefinition could remove protection of more than <br />one million acres of wetlmd, according to Jim Ducey. the direCtor <br />of Preserve Our Water Resources. Among areas removed would be <br />85 percenl of wetlmds in the Smdhills. the largesl smd dune area <br />in the Western Hemisphete and one of the largesl gtass-stabilized <br />dune regions in the world, The hills make up one-quarlef of <br />