My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00015
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSPC00015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 7:33:14 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 1:53:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8064
Description
Section "D" General Federal Issues/Policies - Indian Water Rights
State
TX
Date
1/29/1982
Title
Papago Indian Claims, Report No. 97-422 to Accompany H.R. 5118
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I> <br /> <br />ecutive Order, dated February I, 1917, re-established the Schuk <br />Toak District as part of the Sells Papago Reservation. <br />The'Tucson metropolitan area, population 531,000, is one .of the <br />largest communities in the world that is solely dependent upon <br />groundwater for its municipal and industrial water supply. That <br />water supply comes from several well fields located in the Santa <br />Cruz and A vral Altar Valley basins. <br />These two basins also supply water used by copper mines operat- <br />ed by the Anaconda COInpany, Amax Copper Mines, Inc., the Pima <br />Mining Company, the American Smelting and Refining Company <br />and the Duval Copper Corporation Mines sited located adjacent to <br />the San Xavier Reservation produced 293,098 metric tons of copper <br />In 1980; 24.8 percent of the total production of the United States in <br />that year. <br />Other significant water users in eastern Pima County include <br />the Cortam-Marana Irrigation District, the A vra Valley Irrigation <br />Dact and the Farmers Investment Company. <br />~ assembled by the Water Resources Coordination Committee <br />(WRCC) a voluntary association of the major water users in eastern <br />Pima County, indicate that consumptive use of groundwater <br />pumped from these basins totaled 317,186 acre feet 1 in 1980. Pro- <br />jected consumption will exceed 400,000 acre feet for the year 2000 <br />and 500,000 acre feet in the year 2030.1 . <br />The data also indicate a serious imbalance between existing <br />supply and demand in these basins. Current demand for water ex- <br />ceeds renewable supplies by a ratio of more than four to one. The <br />estimated overdraft of groundwater in 1980 was 225,706 acre feet.' <br />This imbalance has resulted in significant, long term declines in <br />local grl!undwater levels. There is increasing concern that further <br />declIne In water levels will result in increased pumping costs, re- <br />duction in well capacity, diminished water quality and increased <br />risk of land surface subsidence. <br />Recognition of the gravity of the groundwater overdraft problem <br />has le~ w~ter users in Tu~son and eastern Pima county to imple- <br />ment SignIficant conservatIOn measures on a voluntary basis. <br />'j(lcultural users have greatly improved their irrigation effi- <br />CI by land leveling, ditch lining, and installation of pump-back <br />sy s. Further decrease in agricultural water use is anticipated <br />through municipal and industrial development of currently irrigat- <br />ed land. According to data assembled by the WRCC, stich develop- <br />ment could reduce the amount of water consumption per acre by 75 <br />percent. 1 <br />The mines have also realized considerable conservation through <br />a variety of methods, such as recirculation of water, water recovery <br />from tailings areas, use of settling methods prior to disposal of <br />mine waste, reduction of water levels in flotation cells and utiliza- <br />tion of natural seepage. <br />Municipal customers of the City of Tucson have, through volun- <br />tary conservation programs, reduced their average daily per capita <br />demand from 205 gallons in 1974 to 140 gallons in 1979. The signifi- <br /> <br />I Statement of the Water Resources Coordination Committee to the Water and Power He-' <br />sources Subcommittee of the U.S. House Committee on Interi.or and InsuJar Affairs. Mar 13 <br />1981. . . <br /> <br />I; <br /> <br />1033 <br /> <br />:J <br /> <br />cance of this reduction is apparent by comparing this consumption <br />rate with use in other major cities in the Southwest: <br /> <br />Pernzpita <br />demand <br />173 <br />220 <br />310 <br />179 <br />189 <br />140 <br />Tucson......................................................... ................ ...............-...... , <br />The Central Arizona Project, a Federal Reclamation Project that <br />will bring Colorado River water from Parke..- Dam a~ Lake H~vasu, <br />to central and southern Arizona, WIll prOVide additIonal rehef for <br />the overdrawn groundwater basins in eastern Pima County. Dehv- <br />ery of water to Tucson and southern Arizona is expected in .1989. <br />Agricultural, mining and industrial water users who contract for <br />CAP water will be required to reduce groundwater pumpmg on an <br />acre foot for acre foot basis: for every acre foot of CAP water used, <br />the subcontractors must reduce their groundwater pumpmg by an <br />acre foot. . <br />Strict management of groundwater resources is currently being <br />implemented by the Arizona Department of Water Resources pur- <br />suant to a groundwater code enacted by the State legislature in <br />19802. ..' <br />The Code designates four geographIc umts as Active Manag... <br />ment Areas (AMA). Within an AMA all present users of ground- <br />water must file for a certificate of grandfathered pumping rights in <br />order to perfect their right to pump groundwater. Only acreage Ir- <br />rigated any time during the 5 years prIOr to enactment of the Code <br />may be irrigated. New uses ,:"i11 be allowed .only pursuant to State <br />permit. Moreover, the Code Imposes hmltatIons on the transporta- <br />tion of groundwater between sub-basms or away from any AMA. <br />The Tucson Active Management Area corresponds to the geo- <br />graphic boundaries of the Upper Santa Cruz Valley Basin and the <br />Avra/Altar Valley Basin. The goal of the Tucson AMA IS safe <br />yield, that is, a balance between recharge. and WIthdrawals, by Jan- <br />uary I, 2025. <br /> <br />0- <br />-...J <br />c.o <br />.t:. <br /> <br />City: <br />El Paso................... .................................. ................................................. <br />Phoenix.................................................... ................................................... <br />Las Vegas.................................................... ............................................................. <br />San Diego ................................................ .....n................................ <br />Reno ....................................................n........................... ........................................ <br /> <br />i Ariz. Rev. Stats. Ann. 45 ~ 4(~H198Q). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.