My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00006
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSPC00006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:47:49 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 1:53:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272
Description
Colorado River - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - CRBSCP
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/1/1990
Author
Unknown
Title
Meeting Municipal Needs with the Yuma Desalting Plant - Special Report - Second Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />f~""~-l <br />VlJJ;) <br /> <br />85 cubic feetjsec. In order to accommodate the additional flow <br />the lateral would be reshaped and concrete lined. Additionally '\ <br />replacement of the siphon at First street, five check structures, <br />sixteen turnout structures, and three existing bridges would be <br />required. <br /> <br />Water would flow by gravity through the Cooper Lateral the water <br />would be pumped into the Desalting Plant. A pumping plant would <br />be constructed at the north east corner of the Desalting Plant <br />site directly adjacent to the Cooper Lateral. Depending upon the <br />maximum flow rate selected 3 to 4 pump units would be <br />constructed. A 990 foot pipe would convey the water from the <br />pumping plant to the SCR's. Depending upon the design flow the <br />diameter of the pipe could vary from 39 inches to 51 inches. <br />Power for the pumping plant, would be provided from the Desalting <br />Plant 13.8 kv switchyard and would be stepped down to 480 volts. <br /> <br />A wasteway would also need to be constructed at the pumping plant <br />to divert the flow should the pumping plant suddenly shut down. <br />The wasteway designed includes an overflow spillway which will <br />operate as the water surface rises to protect against the water <br />spilling out of the lateral. A pipeline would convey the wasted <br />water to the Colorado River. <br /> <br />Colorado River Intake <br />A third option would be to divert water directly from the <br />Colorado River. Under this option water would be released from ~ <br />Laguna Dam for diversion through an inlet channel to be <br />constructed off the Colorado River just upstream of the city's <br />sewage effluent outfall. Following the concrete canal inlet <br />transition, the water would flow through and be desilted in a <br />900 foot open inlet channel. A reinforced concrete inlet <br />structure would then transition the flow from the channel through <br />a 200 foot conveyance pipeline to a pumping plant sump. The <br />pumping plant, located adjacent to the Yuma Valley Levee would <br />then pump the water through about 17,000 feet of conveyance pipe <br />to the Desalting Plant. <br /> <br />This design provides for <br />adjacent to the levee it <br />potential flood damage. <br />Mgaljd and <br />70 Mgaljd were developed. <br /> <br />desilting and by locating the plant <br />protects the pumping plant from <br />Designs of 20 Mgaljd, 30 Mgaljd, 40 <br /> <br />COMPARISON OF INTAKE OPTIONS <br />In comparing the intake source options, the 1990 construction <br />costs and other factors are shown in Tables 1 and 2 below. <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.