My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153869 Contract
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
3001-3102
>
C153869 Contract
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2014 3:07:22 PM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:27:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153869
Contractor Name
Brown and Caldwell
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
0
County
Jackson
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Contract Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ '. " :. I <br />.., <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Exhibit A cont. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />with local water user groups, public agencies, state representatives, etc. to discuss <br />water resource issues that a decision support system should be able to evaluate in the <br />South Platte Basin. At least half (15) of the interviews will be conducted in person <br />while the remainder (15) may be conducted by phone. All interviews will be <br />conducted by one or more of the key individuals. <br />3. Draft Needs Sectiou: Consolidate comment sheet responses, report reviews and <br />interview notes into a draft report section that describes the needs and capabilities to <br />be met by a SPDSS. Potential needs expected to be identified by the comment sheet, <br />report reviews and interviews might include but should not be limited to the <br />following: <br />. What is the relationship of water use (surface, groundwater, wetlands, <br />trans mountain, etc.) to Stateline flow, water levels in the aquifers, and <br />Colorado's obligation under the South Platte Compact? <br />. What is the relationship between aquifer levels, recharge and streamflow? <br />. Return flow identification will be a significant component of a SPDSS. <br />. Wildlife and wetland issues may be significant. These factors need to be <br />considered in the development of the SPDSS. <br />. What is the firm yield of the South Platte basin? Do we have a good water <br />budget? Is water mining of the aquifers occurring? <br />. Can the recommendation No. 2 and the associated peer review group report <br />from the SB-96-74, Denver Basin and South Platte River Basin Technical <br />Study, Aprili998 be accomplished under SPDSS? The studies and <br />investigations included in recommendation No.2 were asfollows: <br />a) More accurate definition of streambed conductance factors <br />b) Annual stream gain-loss measurements <br />c) Monthly bedrock water-level measurements <br />d) More realistic calculation of stream-jlow depletions <br />e) . Collection/interpretation of pumping record data from each bedrock <br />aquifer <br />f) Collection and compilation of aquifer test and core-analysis data <br />g) Analysis of core samples from bedrock wells in the basin <br />h) Expand the monitoring of declining groundwater levels in the withdrawal <br />areas <br />. Are additiOl;zal stream gages required in the basin? If so, how many, what is <br />the cost and how might they be funded? <br />. is a comprehensive assessment of irrigated acreage, similar to that developed <br />for CRDSS and RGDSS (?), required for the SPDSS? Is one year adequate or <br />should a history of irrigated acreage be developed? <br />. Can ground water pumping be estimated by assuming a full water supply to <br />crops or are other techniques (e.g. power records) required? Can the range of <br />error associated with assuming a full water supply be quantified? Can the <br />analysis accommodate the fact that many wells may have been constructed but <br />not used for one reason or another, particularly in the past? <br /> <br />D:\SPDSS\SP-SCOPE_ 4.doc <br /> <br />August 18, 2000 <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.