Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Beaver Reservoir Company <br />Attention: Mr. Neil Thompson <br />February 4, 1993 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />The sedimentary rocks were intruded by granodioritic rocks during Middle to Late Tertiary <br />Time. These intrusions were primarily in the form of stocks, dikes, sills, and laccoliths. <br />Although the region is generally floored by much older Precambrian Age rocks, the <br />granodioritic intrusions general occurred at or near the boundary between the mesaverde <br />and underlying Mancos shale. In addition there are volcanic deposits in the form of ash <br />flow tuff, basalt flows and volcanic breccia (Ellis et aI. 1987). <br /> <br />The major structural feature in the project region is an anticline which forms the down <br />Wlllp of the Piceance Basin and the intrusive rocks ,in the form of stocks, dikes, sills, and <br />laccoliths. The axis of the anticline is located northeast of the project area and has a <br />northwest-southeast trend. There is a thrust fault along the west edge of the Elk Mountains <br />approximately 25 miles from the Project (Gaskill et al. 1977). This fault has been <br />inteIpreted to be Laramide in age, (Kirkham and Rogers 1981). Another fault has been <br />inteIpreted to be about 30 milessoutllwesLof the Project (Gaskill et al. 1977). This fault <br />is referred to as the Curecanti (Gaskill-eLaI.1977)-or the Cimarron Fault (Kirkham and <br />Rogers 1981). This fault has been inteIpreted as being Precambrian in age. Neither of the <br />faults are classified as active or potentially active (Kirkham and Rogers 1981). <br /> <br />SITE GEOLOGY <br /> <br />The site geology was developed based on data collected by Reclamation for their dam study <br />in 1940 and the data collected from the current test hole drilling program and geophysical <br />investigation performed for this report. <br /> <br />The bedrock underlying Beaver Reservoir generally consists of the Mesaverde Formation, <br />inteIpreted to be either the lower portion of the Ohio Creek Member and/or the overlying <br />Barren Member. Laccolithic intrusions which formed peaks such as Coal Mountain located <br />southwest .for the Project. These laccolithic intrusions into the Mancos shale and the <br />overlying .Mesaverde Formation resulted in a tilting of the overlying bedrock. At the <br />Project the' bedrock has a strike of approximately N50W and a dip towards the east at <br />approximately 20 to. 25 degrees. Faulting likely accompanied the tilting of the beds. <br />Several faults have been inteIpreted as present within the project area based on test hole <br />information, mine workings, and outcrop data (Ellis et al. 1987 and Gaskill et al. 1977). <br /> <br />The bedrock is intermittently exposed in the project area downstream of the dam, limited <br />areas within the reservoir, and around the western margin of the reservoir. The existing <br />dam embankment and reservoir blanketing mantles the bedrock in the immediate vicinity <br />of the dam. Bedrock underlying the dam consists primarily of sandstone and shale with <br /> <br />23067/LEtO 02-04-93(4:24pm)/RPT <br />