Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Beaver Reservoir Company <br />Attention: Mr. Neil Thompson <br />February 4, 1993 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />nominal distance of 50 feet. SP data were collected along each transect using a station <br />spacing of 20 to 35 feet, depending on the total length of the transect. <br /> <br />SP data were collected using MicroGeophysics millivoItmeters. These units are high- <br />impedance systems that allow measurement of the SP value and the contact resistance <br />between the soil and the electrodes. Tinkor and Rasor Model 6B copper-copper sulfate <br />electrodes were used for the survey. Throughout the survey period, electrodes were fairly <br />stable with measured drifts of 8 mv or less. <br /> <br />SP data were collected in a series of short loops from a constant base station. Each loop <br />generally included the data collection for approximately 15 stations, and was generally one <br />hour duration or less, thus minimizing drift corrections. <br /> <br />Processing of the SP raw data included making drift corrections and normalizing each SP <br />value to the base station reference. After removaIofdrift, the SP values were seen to have <br />a small dependence on surface topography. Asinall correction for topography was applied <br />to the data removing the topographic effects. Corrected SP values for each line were then <br />plotted for the entire survey area and contoured (see Appendix C). <br /> <br />Contouring was accomplished using the computer software GEOSOFf. Inputs to the <br />contouring include relative station' Coordinates and values, a spacing for gridding the raw <br />data (generally 22 feet) and a contour interval. Color enhancing is accomplished using the <br />gridded values from the raw data. <br /> <br />Significant seepage patterns are typically linear features with anomalies on the order of 25- <br />75 millivolts. Corwin and Butler (1989) indicate that negative SP anomalies are often seen <br />in areas where seepage flow is entering an embankment, or where the seepage flow is <br />horizontal ,or descending; and that positive anomalies are often observed where flow is <br />ascending. toward the.surface or where surface seepage with outward current is occurring. <br /> <br />Although there are several small anomalies over the survey area, there are no anomalies <br />of sufficient amplitude to indicate substantial seepage conduits through the dam <br />embankment. Seepage conduits were generally not active because the water level in the <br />reservoir had been drawn down significantly at the time of our investigation. In general, <br />the majority of the survey area has a relatively flat SP response. The total range of <br />contoured values is from -14 mv to + 16 mv, or 30 mv. The general distribution of SP <br />values appear to be primarily related to embankment material thickness rather than to <br />preferential seepage patterns. With the exception of the right abutment and spillway area, <br /> <br />23067/LEIO 02-04-93(4:24pm)/RPT <br />