Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />..:;:_ -r <br /> <br />8.0 <br />FINANCIAL EVALUATION <br /> <br />8.1 GENERAL <br /> <br />Several different concepts for rehabilitation of Beaver Reservoir were evaluated and <br />construction costs were developed. Each of the options would allow continued operation <br />of the dam through the length of the loan period. A financial evaluation was also <br />conducted to compare the costs of rehabilitation for each of the options to the value of <br />the Beaver Reservoir water. <br /> <br />The value of Beaver Reservoir water may be estimated by evaluating the potential <br />economic effects of eliminating, without replacement, the water from BRe. Economic <br />effects are reflected in the difference of the value of .irrigated versus dry land crop <br />acreage. A summary of this analysisispresen!ed in Table 8-1. Table 8-1 indicates that <br />the loss of BRC water would amount to an annual loss of revenue of about $221,000 and <br />a loss of profit of about $44,200 (assuming avera.ge prices) to those served by BRC <br />water. This analysis is believed to be conservative as it does not address higher value <br />crops such as fruit and vegetables. <br /> <br />The projected annual revenue loss of $221,000 represents an average value of $138 per <br />share per year in the BRCand about $138 per acre-foot per year of Beaver Reservoir <br />water. <br /> <br />~ ...- <br /> <br />8.2 FINANCIAL EVALUATION <br /> <br />The BRC i:j]~s to make loan payments through their annual assessments. Several <br />financial programs. for the recommended rehabilitation alternatives were developed to <br />evaluate the assessments needed for the different options and the total project costs as <br />compared to the value of the water. <br /> <br />The financial programs for the rehabilitation alternative are shown in Tables 8-2 to 8-7. <br />Operating and maintenance expenses were estimated from 1990 and 1992 data, which <br /> <br />23Q67/Rl.8 09-03.93(3:29pm)/RPT <br /> <br />8-1 <br />