My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153718 Contract
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
C153718 Contract
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:44:23 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:24:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153718
Contractor Name
Morgan County Quality Water District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Morgan
Bill Number
HB 95-1155
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Contract Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0.1/ .10' J..:J;J..) <br /> <br />1:;.l;J".JV -,._,--,--.-. rll"" .", ...,. ....'-'.... <br /> <br />, , <br />Morgan County Quality Water District <br /> <br />r.o, BOX 1216 <br />~ORT MORGAN, COLORADO e0701 <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />," <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />16 January 1995 <br /> <br />I iT.~ FILE <br />lJLIIt It - I q Ef..."..._ <br />~ HAMEr'O, ~~_o, <br />mi. Dm L u..<:l.Q.... <br />IIOlNEll JA~ 1 1\ ''''1- <br />FIll TYPE.-booo. co~.~_.... <br /> <br />~'~~~' <br />_ ,_t~ <br />IIAf,!( "...(~T;.z.~03 <br />--v:- O/-4Y <br /> <br />(30:l) 6(;7'2803 <br /> <br />David W. Holman <br />Vice President <br />The Northern Trust Company <br />50 South La~alle Street ' <br />Chicago, IL 60675 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Holman: <br /> <br />I have reviewed your letter of January 5, 1995, regarding <br />our District's lease and past discussions concerning pos6ible <br />purchase of the water the District is leasing from the F Quarter <br />Circle Ranch family with our Board at its meeting on January 10. <br />1995. I am .sorry if you and the family felt that our meetings <br />and discussions had in 1992 concerning possible purchase of the <br />subject water required further correspondence in this regard. <br />Frankly, it was the impression of the Board and me that the <br />Oi strict' s view of the value of purchasing this wa ter and the <br />family's view, Le.. $1,500,000 versus $4,819,530, were so far . <br />apart that f>>rther discussion seemed unnecessary. <br /> <br />Perhaps we were wrong, but we assumed. that the position of <br />the family ,as to what they consid8red they would require for the <br />purchase was so far in excess of what our investigation calcula- <br />tions would show the water would be tvorth to the District, that <br />it seemed to be a waste of all of our time and efforts to continue <br />further our discussions and negotiations had in 1992 regarding the <br />possible purchase. <br /> <br />As I believe we indicated to you and the family in 1992, it <br />was the desire of the Board to first attempt to try to negotiatl? <br />a r,easonable purchase price for the leased water before investi... <br />gating and pursuing other avenues of a more permanent supply of <br />water for the District of comparable quality, without be!n'] <br />dependent on.the various conditions of a lease of water. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />DIRECTORS <br />Paul L, McDill, Presldam <br />relrY Co..$/Ii. v. P,ee,idanl <br />Harofd E. HatlGon, Sec:v1arynreasurer <br />Dale 1.4, Johnson, Oiroctor <br />Latty J. Ct'IrPst.ntan. Oir9ctor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.