Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br />,~, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Agenda Item 18 <br />January 23, 1995 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Power Authority funding as well as TABOR amendment revenue requirements would <br />amount to an increase in average residential water rates of about $10 per month. <br /> <br />Regional Considerations <br /> <br />The SWSP involves a total of nine entities (Berthoud, Broomfield, Erie, Fort Lupton, <br />Fort Morgan, Hudson, Longmont, Louisville, and Superior) as well as the MCQWD. <br />Phase I of the MCOWD project involves all of the SWSP participants, Phase II <br />involves Fort Morgan and the District. (Erie, Fort Lupton, Fort Morgan and Hudson <br />have final or conditional authorizations for Construction Fund loans to participate in <br />the SWSP.) The District's financial participation in the SWSP is estimated to amount <br />to about $3.5 million. <br /> <br />Should the District choose not to participate in the SWSP, there may be an impact on <br />all participants but the City of Fort Morgan is likely to be most impacted by such a <br />decision. Fort Morgan has a conditional authorization for $5.5 million from the <br />Construction ,Fund and has recently submitted several studies to the CWCB staff for a <br />final determination of feasibility. The City is expected to request funding for SWSP <br />participation at the March 1995 Board meeting, <br /> <br />. RECOMMENDA nON <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It is the opinion of the Board staff that the proposed project is technically and financially <br />feasible, Both the Division of Local Government credit report and the analyses in the draft <br />feasibility study by Underwood indicate that the financial condition of the District is <br />generally sound and that the proposed project may result in substantial but not unreasonable <br />rate increases, <br /> <br />The question of the "enterprise" status of the MCQWD may require a change in the District's <br />existing revenue structure or an election to incur debt but the issue would have to, in any <br />case, be resolved before the District and the Board could enter into a contract. <br /> <br />With regard to alternatives to the proposed project, it is the opinion of the staff that more <br />analysis would be useful to clearly justify the $5,7 million investment. A less expensive <br />alternative might result should the District again enter into negotiations for purchase of the <br />Hay Gulch wells, The District's concerns, however, with regard to possible contamination of <br />the source by nearby oil wells and agricultural activity may be a genuine reason for <br />developing another, more expensive, source of supply, <br /> <br />Regarding refunding of the existing water bonds, it is the staff s opinion that such refinancing <br />would best be accomplished through the Small Water Resources Projects Program of the <br />