Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /># I~~~~IJ <br /> <br />(c) Vail Valley Consolidated Water District revenues: 7 <br /> l22l l221 -f'/ e <br /> \Vater Enterprise Fund: t/~ I' <br /> (tap fees. water service fees. <br /> laxes. investment income. <br /> transfers. other) S 1.575.659 S 2.255.314 <br /> General Government Fund: <br /> (property taxes and transfers) 551.909 471.269 <br /> Dcbt Service Fund: <br /> (tap fees. property taxes. <br /> ownership taxes. investment <br /> income. other) 458.059 482.935 <br /> Total Revenues S 2.585.627 S 3.209.518 <br />(d) Vail Associates. Inc. revenues: <br /> <br />Gross revenues exceed S 1 00 million per year in both 1993 and 1994; gross <br />revenues include revenues from lin tickets. ski school. hospitality. food <br />service and other operations. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Please provide a brief narrative description of potential sources of funding (in <br />addition fo the C\\'CB) which have been explored or which will be explored <br />for the proposed project. Othcr sources of outside borrowing have not been <br />explored thus far. Howc\'cr. based on the experience of the Clinton Reservoir <br />transaction. given the mix of public and private entities. other sources offunding <br />arc not readil)' available. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />\Vhat collateral will )'OU be offering for this loan? Shares of stock in thc ditch <br />and reservoir company to be formcd. We propose that the structure of the <br />collateral and loan documentation be similar to the Clinton Rcservoir transaction <br />with the Conservation Board, <br /> <br />II <br />