My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153716 Contract
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
C153716 Contract
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:44:13 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:17:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153716
Contractor Name
Purgatorie River Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
0
County
Las Animas
Bill Number
SB 99-173, HB 95-115
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Contract Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />June 2, 1997 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />In Reach 2, the USGS was able to track peaks and daily flows in the existing flow records and <br />concluded that the median annual gain/loss approaches zero, Summer and fall periods on average <br />have small (1-3 cfs) losses, Traveltimes through the 40 mile reach range from 12 to 48 hours, with <br />one day being a reasonable average. <br /> <br />In Reach 3, traveltimes were slightly longer, but also close to one day on average, There were small <br />gains at all times of year, from a low of 2 cfs in the winter, but approaching 15 cfs during the <br />summer, These gains were most likely due to unmeasured return flows from the 4,500 irrigated <br />acres in the reach, <br /> <br />These findings were somewhat surprising in that they refute the conventional wisdom that the lower <br />Purgatoire was some type of "black hole" into which water disappeared never to be seen again, <br />These findings are inconsistent with the "negative" transit loss theory that PRWCD was hoping to <br />advance, Never-the-less, water users and officials now have a better basis for administering future <br />exchanges and futile call determinations. Whether a Phase 2 study is warranted is doubtful, but still <br />open to discussion and being considered by the PRWCD. <br /> <br />cc: CWCB Board Members <br />Sandy MacDougall <br />David Harrison <br /> <br />C\SRMILLER\ARKANSAS\PRQJECTS\TRANSlnPURGTL03.MEM <br />June2, ]997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.