Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />"', <br />I~()t) /\ 1_' /' I ,'_ <br /> <br />'8tl6>.s Ji.Je 7.3;'--....) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.:> <br />'--' <br /> <br />FILED DISTRICT COURT <br />ROUTT COUNTY <br /> <br />IN THE UI~TRICT CUUltT IN ANI) fOR Tllli <br />COUNTY' Qt' ROUTT AND ~'TA TE 0/ (;OlOltADO <br /> <br />MAR 8 1966 <br />r~~ <br />CLERK <br /> <br />Civil Action No. j8l5 <br /> <br />IN THE MATTlli Ur' THEPE.'TITIUN FUR ) <br />THE URGANIZATIUN OF THE UI'Plli ) <br />YAMPA WATER CONSERVANCY UJ.:;Tllll-'T. ) <br /> <br />D 1!; C R E E <br /> <br />This cause coming on for hearing on this Hth day 01' March, .l '166, on <br /> <br />the petition for organization of a water conservancy district filed in this <br /> <br />cause on the 21st day of December, 19b5. Various of the petitioners appeared <br /> <br />in person and all of the petitioners appeared by their attorney, Nicholas <br />Magill. No other persons appeared to object' or to protest to the said peti- <br />tion or the formation 01' sai.j, District and there were no other appearances. <br /> <br />Thereupon, the petitioners, ~hrough their counsel, submitted evidence in <br /> <br />support of the allegations oj' the petition, and the Court having considered <br /> <br />the petition and the record and the files herein, and the evidence submitted <br /> <br />in behalf of the petitioners, and being now fully advised in the premises, <br /> <br />makes the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The petition for the organization or said district was filed in <br /> <br />this cause on the 21st day of December, 1965, on which date the Court entered <br /> <br />an order for a hearing on said petition, and directed notice to be given of <br /> <br />the time and place of said hearing, as required by law; thereafter, the peti- <br /> <br />tioners filed a bond for costs and expenses as provided b! statute, and the <br /> <br />Court entered an order approving said bond. <br />2. The proposed district, as described in the petition, has an assessed <br /> <br />va!uation of irrigated land, together with improvements thereon, within said <br />proposed district of less than twenty million dollars; that the petition (which <br />in form consists 01' several similar petitions) is signed by no fewer than <br /> <br />twenty-f~ve (25%) per cent of the owners of irrigated lands to be included in <br />the proposed district, but not embraced within the corporate limits of a city <br />or to~.. :>aid petition is likewise signed by- not fewer than five (5%) per cer/; <br /> <br />..,":. <br /> <br />,.,. <br /> <br />1"". <br /> <br />': <br />. '~','i\?;::j ~i":t1.,\tl!i:'~;4',]i't-:,~::.;..:~'t."~~'~ :fl.l <br />"" . -""ii""." I.., ""':i~"'}'Jll"lI!i>i!1r'- <br />',. ,:'i';':);:jt,! ';:':~j~'/::,{~!4f;f~~&rj~~~(~~ <br />J:' : ::"'i"(!', ,;:'!,:1 ~ :', ' ':,;::~:~,::~lli~~.I'I:'\''#,!r~t <br />