Laserfiche WebLink
<br />) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br />. <br /> <br />Lupton line near Platteville. The collateral for the second ($8 million) loan is a security <br />interest in the City's capacity in the entire run of pipeline from Carter Lake to Fort <br />Morgan. The best indication of the value of the collateral in this case is the $21.5 million <br />figure in the last row ofthe table since this is what the City actually paid for their <br />proportionate share of pipeline costs. <br /> <br />For the first two segments, it's probably safe to assume that the value of capacity in the <br />SWSP will remain at original cost or may appreciate since the project is located in a <br />rapidly developing part of the state. <br /> <br />Development near the third segment is more limited but there is an interest by <br />communities east of Fort Morgan in participating in the SWSP because of problems with <br />groundwater quality in the area. Public Service Co. has also expressed an interest in <br />utilizing some ofthe capacity in the SWSP for their Pawnee generating plant near Fort <br />Morgan. <br /> <br />Conclusions <br /> <br />I believe that the $21.5 million total cost of Fort Morgan's participation in the SWSP <br />represents a good approximation of the value of the Board's collateral. For total lending <br />then of$13.5 million, the loans are secured by collateral with an apparent value of about <br />$21.5 million. In the event that the market value of the third segment is less than $13.5 <br />million, it still appears as if there is still more than sufficient value in the entire project to <br />cover the loan. <br /> <br />Cc: Bill Stanton <br />Mike Serlet <br />Jan Illian <br />Linda Bassi, AGO <br /> <br />2 <br />