Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />consists of a set of radial gates (structure 6) to shut off the flow into the Owl Creek Supply <br />Ditch, a concrete spillway waIJ upstream of the gates. and a radial gate into Owl Creek. This <br />set of strucrures is very important to the system to reduce the flood potential and the resultant <br />damage that would OCcur to the ditch and property owners downstream of the ditch. <br /> <br />The Structures are in fair condition. The radial gates need some minor maimenance and <br />repair and the spillway structure is in good condition and does nO( require any modifications <br />or repair. The only major repair work required to mainlain these Structures in good working <br />condition is some repair of the concrete walls that suppon the [wo radial gales in the ditch as <br />shown on the photo of Structure 6. The concrete is cracked and spalled on the bottom portion <br />of the support walls and the construction joint between the walls and base slab is eroded. <br />There is some bank cutting on the upstream side that will erode the wall backfill with time <br />if left unchecked. <br /> <br />The concrete on Structure 6 should be repaired by chipping out the defective concrete and <br />replacing with a nonshrink grout. The base slab [0 wall joint should also be chipped back [Q <br />sound concrete and repaired with grout. <br /> <br />The maintenance on the gates consisLS of lubrica[ing the lifts and pulley shaft and repairing <br />the cables. The single radial gate to Owl Creek is being lifted by only one of its two cables <br />and it is twisting the gate and its frame. <br /> <br />We did nO[ analyze the hydraulic capacity of the system or the required capacity as this was <br />beyond the scope of work for this study. <br /> <br />Also included in the cost at this location is the work associated with the installation of a <br />measuring flume. This will allow the Company to determine the total flow into their system <br />including water from Owl Creek. Currently they can only measure the water from the Eaton <br />Ditch and can nO[ determine the Owl Creek flows. <br /> <br />Head:;!'3te Flow l\leasurement <br /> <br />Most of the headg:nes discharge into an open ditch that is directed onto the irrigated fields or into <br />a pond that is used [Q supply feeder ditches or a center-pivot sprinkler system. As proposed <br />herein. all headgates that supply open ditches will be measured using a cur-throat flume as derailed <br />on Figure 10. All headgates supplying center-pivot systems will be measured using a meter gate <br />as shown on Figure II. <br /> <br />Structure 5A - Cut-Throat Flume. The cut-throat flume was chosen for measurement of <br />flows from !.he headgate [Q ditch application due to its simplicity and low head loss through <br />the structure. The floor of the flume is flat and is easier to construct than a Parshall flume. <br />The head losses through the flume are less than a weir and the cut-throat flume can accurately <br />measure submerged flows. The flume can easily be made OUI of precast concrete and <br />transported [Q the site and set in place. <br /> <br />Owl Creek Feasibility <br /> <br />Page 13 <br />