My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJC00189
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
PROJC00189
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2012 9:50:07 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:04:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150006
Contractor Name
Palisade, Town of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
72
County
Mesa
Bill Number
HB 95-1155
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />inexpensive, but heavy and available only in short lengths. Steel pipe is <br />lightweight, but must be protected from corrosion and requires close <br />inspection. PVC pipe is frequently used; however, it can only withstand <br />limited pressures and is more fragile than other types of pipe. Both steel <br />and PVC require select material for bedding and backfill. <br /> <br />It appears that the most suitable type of pipe for this project will be ductile <br />iron pipe, mainly because it may be necessary to use natural on-site <br />materials for bedding and backfill. The ductile iron pipe is capable of <br />being bedded under more adverse conditions and can withstand rougher <br />handling. It can also handle higher pressures by using thicker wall pipes. <br />Its main disadvantage is its moderately heavy weight and greater material <br />cost. However, this will be offset by cost savings on bedding and backfill, <br />since they will not have to be imported. <br /> <br />The present plan is to install the new pipe parallel to the existing pipeline. <br />It will be desirable to keep the old pipe totally in place until the new lines <br />is installed to provide water to the plant. Because of limited working <br />room, it may be necessary in some places to remove the existing pipe. <br /> <br />c) Comparison of Pressure Pipe vs Non-Pressnre Pipe Installation The <br />elevation drop and potential in-line pressures for a pressurized pipeline are <br />as follows: <br /> <br /> Elev. Static <br />Location ~ Dml1 Pressnre <br />Cabin Res. Box 7410 ft. 0 0 <br />Wye 5335 ft. 2075 ft. 892 psi <br />WTP 5010 ft. 2400 ft. 1032 psi <br /> <br />Although equipment will be provided to reduce water hammer, pressure <br />surges are likely which would increase pressures above those shown. The <br />high pressures only exist on the pipeline when water is not flowing; when <br />water is flowing, headloss and velocity head reduce the static head. The <br />high velocities and high transient pressures will require substantial pipe <br />restraints for the pressured line installation. <br /> <br />Since the water will be flowing continuously in the non-pressure pipe, the <br />possibility of freezing is considerably less. Therefore, a burial depth of 3 <br />feet should be adequate. For the pressure pipe, the water may be shut off <br />for extended periods and a greater burial depth for frost protection is <br />needed. A 5 foot depth of bury has been selected for the pressure pipe. <br />In addition, the greater depth will provide greater trench support (to prevent <br /> <br />V-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.