Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(Appendix A). Site C is the lower Rapid Creek intake; Site I is the middle Cottonwood <br />Creek intake. The water at Site I meets l\ll Secondary Standards; the water at Site C <br />exceeds limits for total dissolved solids, hardness and alkalinity. It should be noted that <br />Site C is about 400 feet lower than Site I. Water tends to pick up more minerals at <br />lower elevations. This is demonstrated by the data in Tables A2 and A3 (Appendix A). <br />Only specific conductance was measured irt the samples; however, a rule of thumb <br />conversion factor is .65 mg/l TDS for one unit of specific conductance. <br /> <br />Rapid Creek has a lesser gradient Compared to Cottonwood basin. This allows <br />more precipitation to infiltrate into the ground. This water later surfaces at springs, <br />many of which are near the contact point with the Mesa Verde formation (which is <br />relatively impermeable). The groundwater dissolves soluble minerals as it passes through <br />the Green River and Wasatch formations. This is the primary reason for the higher <br />mineral content in Rapid Creek. Kruzen Springs, which is located at a relatively high <br />elevation, has the highest quality (lowest nrineral content) of any of the water sources. <br /> <br />Palisade mixes water from its lowet Rapid Creek diversions with water from other <br />sources; thus, the water which passes through the water treatment plant has always passed <br />the requirements for Secondary Standards. During the wet years, Palisade uses <br />Cottonwood Creek water as much as possible. <br /> <br />F. AVERAGE AND FIRM YIELD OJ? WATERSHED <br /> <br />1. General. <br /> <br />The tabulation of water rights is only one indication of the water which <br />will be available to the TOWn of Palisade from their watershed. Equally <br />important is the actual physical supply of water available in the basin from <br />year to year. The two parameters normally used to assess physical supply <br />are: average year flow and l:xtreme dry year flow. If there is adequate <br />reservoir storage to carry thl: system over 2-3 dry years, then average year <br />flow may be the most impoI1ant parameter. However, if reservoir storage <br />is limited, then the dry year flow becomes more important. Both average <br />year and dry year flows will be evaluated as part of the operations model <br />discussed in this section. <br /> <br />2. Source of Information <br /> <br />Two previous reports have been prepared for the Town which evaluate <br />water resources on the PaliSllde watershed. The first report was prepared <br />in 1979 by Leonard Rice & Associates of Denver. That report used stream <br />gage data from 10 similar watersheds in Western Colorado to develop <br />regression equations which related stream flow, basin area and elevation. <br />These equations were then used, in turn, to calcu1ate the firm yield of the <br />Rapid Creek/Cottonwood Creek watershed. <br /> <br />IV-14 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />