My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00553
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00553
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:28 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:01:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0022X
Contractor Name
West Anvil Water & Power Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Garfield
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
368
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />at Palisade, Colorado is a constant 1,100 cfs from July to <br />Apri 1 and momentary peak flows of 8,000 cfs in May and <br />June. The future minimum flow demand of 1,100 cfs was <br />adopted for the purposes of this study over and above all <br />other existing and future uses except for <br />hydropower demands. However, it was indicated in recent <br />discussions with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that <br />the minimum stream flow requirements are not 1 ikely to be <br />implemented. <br /> <br />E. <br /> <br />FIRM WATER YIELD <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />After the virgin flows had been established for the Colorado River at <br />Webster Hi 11 by adding historic upstream depletions to the recorded <br />gaged flows adjusted to the Webster Hill site, future river flows at <br />the site were projected by reducing the virgin flows by both past <br />depletions and future depletions predicted under the three <br />development scenarios. These projected inflows to the reservoir were <br />then balanced against predicted downstream demands for the three <br />development scenarios. Any surplus was designated as storable flow <br />which could be retained to fill any available storage in the <br />reservoir. <br /> <br />The WWE report concluded that under Scenario I development conditions <br />the reservoir would be able to capture its full 20,000 ac-ft of <br />active storage every year. This means that under Scenario I the <br />reservoir could be completely empty and still be entitled to fill <br />completely, even in a critical drought year. The critical drought <br />year is analogous to a 100 year-flood, in that it is an event which <br />has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. A <br />100-year drought occurred in 1977 in the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Under Scenario II development conditions, the WWE report concludes <br />that the reservoir would be entitled to capture all of the 20,000 ac- <br />ft of active storage in every year except the critical drought year, <br />when only 11,000 ac-ft could be captured. This event would only <br /> <br />3686-a/6 <br /> <br />II-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.