My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00553
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00553
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:28 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:01:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0022X
Contractor Name
West Anvil Water & Power Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Garfield
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
368
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />usual use of this term should not lead to the conclusion that <br />the event indicated can happen only once in x years, and having <br />occurred, will not happen again for another period of x years. <br />It means rather that over a long span of years, we can expect as <br />many x-year floods (or larger) as there are x-year-long periods <br />within that span. Floods occur randomly and may be bunched or <br />spread out unevenly with respect to time, and predicting their <br />distribution is not possible. The frequency of a particular <br />flood event should be considered as the percent chance of an <br />event of that magnitude (or greater) occurring in anyone year. <br />A 100-year flood would therefore have a 1% chance of being <br />equaled or exceeded in any given year. <br /> <br />The PMF does not have a frequency value per se, although it is <br />sometimes assigned a frequency value of 1,000 years for <br />comparative analysis in frequency studies. It can be seen from <br />the above definition of flood frequency that the PMF can occur <br />the first year after a project is bui lt, although the odds are <br />very heavily against it. <br /> <br />G. <br />1. <br /> <br />RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION <br />Sediment Yield <br />Sediment inflow into the Webster Hill reservoir was estimated <br />from USBR measurements of suspended sediment in the Colorado <br />River at the Rulison Bridge, approximately 4 mi downstream from <br />the dam site. The USBR measurements were made during the spring <br />flood of 1979, when river flows ranged from 1,758 cfs on March 3 <br />to 21,150 cfs on June 15. The 13 suspended sediment measure- <br />ments taken by the USBR were plotted against the measured river <br />discharges on a logarithmic scale, and a sediment rating curve <br />was constructed by fitting two power functions to the data using <br />the least squares method. <br /> <br />An est imate of the average suspended sed iment load was computed <br />by combining the data from the sediment rating curve with the <br />flow duration data compiled from an analysis of the DeBeque and <br /> <br />3686-a/5 <br /> <br />1-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.