Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE OF eONTENTS <br />(eONTINUED) <br /> <br />7.0 SITE SELEeTION STUDY ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11 <br /> <br />7.1 Site Selection Methodology ............................ 11 <br />7.2 Regional Screening ................................. 12 <br />7.3 Fatal Flaw Study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13 <br />7.4 Site eharacterization and Ranking ........................ 14 <br />7.5 Expanded Site Selection Study .......................... 17 <br /> <br />7.5.1 General.................................... 17 <br />7.5.2 Expanded Site Selection Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 17 <br />7.5.3 Construction Cost Comparison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19 <br /> <br />8.0 REGULATORY eLASSIFICATION AND REQUIREMENTS. . . . . . . . . .. 20 <br /> <br />8.1 General..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 20 <br />8.2 Jurisdictional Dam vs. Nonjurisdictional Dam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 20 <br /> <br />8.3 Dam Class ...................................... 20 <br />8.4 Dam Size ....................................... 21 <br />8.5 Regulatory Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22 <br /> <br />9.0 DAM BREAK ANALYSES AND HAZARD eLASSIFICATION . . . . . . . .. 22 <br /> <br />9.1 General... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22 <br />9.2 Development of Floodwave Routing Model .................. 22 <br /> <br />9.2.1 The Hazard 3 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 23 <br />9.2.2 The HEe-1 Model ............................. 23 <br /> <br />9.3 Results of the Dam Break and Floodwave Study ............... 24 <br />9.4 Discussion of Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 24 <br /> <br />9.4.1 Hazard 3 Results .............................. 24 <br />9.4.2 HEe-l Results ............................... 24 <br />9.4.3 eomparison and Evaluation of Results ................. 24 <br />9.4.4 Hazard elassification Review and Determination. . . . . . . . . .. 26 <br />9.4.5 Mitigation of Dam Breach Floodwave Hazard ............ 26 <br /> <br />10.0 EMBANKMENT DESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 29 <br /> <br />10.1 Embankment Design Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 29 <br /> <br />10 .1.1 <br /> <br />erest Design ............................ 29 <br />