Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ES-2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />o PrE'paration of a financial analysis on the final alternatives. <br /> <br />o PrEparation of a comprehensive report which summarizes the work <br />corrpleted during the study. <br /> <br />Water Supply <br />The average annua 1 flow of the North Fork of the Wh ite River is about <br />214,000 acre-feet. At the state line the White River averages about 503,000 <br />acre-feet annually. Most of the water is derived from snowmelt and occurs <br />from May thr)ugh July. <br /> <br />The YJWCD OWIlS conditional storage and direct flow water rights on the North <br />Fork that ha'le an adjudication date of 1966 and an appropriation date of <br />1953. These rights were assumed to have an annual depletion of 80,000 <br />acre-feet pel' year and a yield of 87,500 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Water Demand~; <br />The Yellow Jacket Project was assumed to providt! water for agriculture, <br />industry (coal and oil shale), and the municipal and domestic needs of the <br />Meeker area. Based on responses to questionnaires and interviews involving <br />these potential water users, water delivery requirements were estimated. <br />Eighteen thollsand acre-feet of water for irrigation would be delivered to <br />approximately 8000 acres of land in the Little Beaver and Coal Creek <br />Basins. FivE thousand acre-feet would be available in the White River for <br />diversion for munidpal and domestic water users in the Meeker area. Coal <br />interests northeast of Meeker would be provided 12,000 acre-feet. The <br />remalnlng 52,500 acre-feet .would be provided for the oil shale interests in <br />the Piceance and Yellow Creek Basins. The above demands would result in an <br />annual depletion to the White River of approximately 80,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Formulation of Alternative Plans <br />The initial conceptual plans included 16 separate reservoir sites and <br />numerous collect ion and de 1 i very systems. Sing 1 e and mu lt i p 1 e reservoi I' <br />systems were :onsidered. After a technica.l review of each conceptual plan, <br />eight were selected to undergo further evaluation. This evaluation included <br />