My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153333 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
C153333 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2014 11:43:55 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:59:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153333
Contractor Name
Beaver Park Water, Inc.
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
12
County
Fremont
Bill Number
SB 80-67
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />V-J <br /> <br />chamber, level with the invert of the 42-inch pipe, <br />The major problem with the diversion dam is that the. <br />sand and gravel carried by Beaver Creek has filled the pool. <br />so that there is less than a 3-acre foot capacity to the <br />pool to absorb variations in stream flow rates. The sluice <br />gate has been utilized two or three times each year to re- <br />move accumulated sediment, but is only able to remove up to <br />about 7.000 cubic yards each time the pool is flushed. The <br />leakage problems with the sluice gate make this a tedious <br />operation, <br />If the capacity of the diversion pool were increased, <br />less sand could enter the aqueduct and streamflow fluctua- <br />tions would be dampened. resulting in fewer trips by the <br />ditch rider to adjust the gate opening, Measurement of the <br />filled area upstream of the diversion dam indicates that the <br />pool could 'be enlarged up to a 50-acre foot capacity by dig- <br />ging, This would remove about 80,000 cubic yards of sand <br />and gravel. The pool would again fill in after several years, <br />but some improvements could be achieved, The material could <br />be stockpiled on the floodplain next to the pool, A con- <br />tractor might be interested in removing the material and <br />there is an access road on the west side of the diversion. <br />At present, the only point to remove sand from the 42- <br />inch pipeline is through an eight-inch drain line which is <br />located where the pipeline climbs up out of the Beaver Creek <br />valley, This drain line is not large enough to generate a <br />high velocity to flush much sand from the pipeline, There is <br />a need for an in-line sand trap to be located immediately <br />downstream of the diversion dam. A box structure with in- <br />ternal baffles would allow much of the sand which enters <br />through the diversion to be settled out and periodically be <br />flushed back to Beaver Creek. A combination of the sand <br />trap and enlarging the diversion pool should greatly reduce <br />the sediment load into the upper canal, <br />The recommended improvements at the diversion dam are: <br />1. removal of 80.000 cubic yards of accumulated <br />sediment; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.