My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00527
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:27 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:59:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0024X
Contractor Name
Florida Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
La Plata
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
322
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />will be on each downstream leg of the "T". The butterfly valves <br />will be automatically operated. The bypass pipe will loop over <br />the top of the turbine and will be used if the turbine is shut <br />down. The automatic valves will direct water through the bypass. <br />The bypass is included because releases must be made to downstream <br />water users if the unit is inoperable. <br /> <br />This configuration will provide the best turbine output <br />because the head loss is the least. Also the pipe system is the <br />shortest and has the fewest bends which will reduce the turbulence <br />as much as possible. The cost of removing the concrete from the <br />bend will be less than constructing the pedestal in Plan C but <br />more than the extra piping in Plan B. The most significant <br />advantage is that about 90,000 additional kWh per year will be <br />generated with this plan over the other configurations. <br /> <br />Piping Plan A is the best piping plan when considering the <br />long term performance, and if it can be developed in conjunction <br />with the outlet dewatering for the gate repair, would be the <br />" <br />recommended action. If for some reason the gate repair is de- <br />layed, Plan B would be recommended. Then when the outlet is de- <br />watered at a later time, Piping Plan A can then be incorporated <br />without moving the turbine. <br /> <br />7.3 TURBINE SELECTION <br /> <br />The turbine for Lemon Dam must meet four specific criteria: <br />1) the turbine and generator must physically fit in the space <br />available in the gate chamber, 2) the turbine and generator must <br />fit in the elevator or through the manhole in order to be moved to <br />the gate chamber, 3) performance curves on the turbine operation <br />must be available to evaluate the unit output and determine if the <br />unit would maintain releases between 9 and 13 cfs, and 4) the <br />revolutions per minute (rpm) of the unit must be about 1200 or <br />less to avoid cavitation at the elevation setting. (See Appendix <br />C.) <br /> <br />7.0-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.