My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00519
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00519
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:03:46 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:59:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153597
Contractor Name
Windsor Reservoir and Canal Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
3
County
Larimer
Bill Number
HB 91-1006
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Woodward. Clyde Consultants <br /> <br />A cement-bentonite slurry wall was considered as one method of reducing seepage <br />through the embankment in the area of the outlet works. The slurry wall would be <br />constructed using current construction techniques. The wall would extend from the <br />ground surface down into bedrock, a depth of approximately 70 feet. The cement- <br />bentonite slurry wall would extend about 100 feet either side of the existing outlet works <br />and would encompass the outlet pipe. <br /> <br />The second alternative considered was a three part remediation. This alternative would <br />require the construction of a clay blanket on the upstream face of the existing <br />embankment. The blanket would be approximately 5 feet in thickness normal to the <br />slope, approximately 300 feet wide, and would extend from the crest of the dam to the <br />toe of the embankment. A slurry wall would be constructed near the upstream toe of <br />the embankment. The wall would be the same width as the clay blanket and would tie <br />into the blanket. The slurry wall would extend from the ground surface into the <br />bedrock. This alternative would also require the construction of a buttress on the <br />downstream face of the embankment. The buttress would be constructed by excavating <br />the downstream slope to an approximately 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope and placing <br />a sand blanket with a clay cover. The final downstream slope would be approximately <br />2.7:1. <br /> <br />The third alternative considered includes reconstruction of the existing embankment <br />above the outlet works. This construction would require excavation of the embankment <br />from above the outlet pipe, at an approximately 2:1 slope, to the crest with a bottom <br />width of about 30 to 40 feet. A cutoff collar would installed around the outlet pipe. <br />The embankment would then be replaced and compacted to the proper moisture and <br />density requirements. A chimney/blanket drain would be constructed within the <br />reconstructed embankment above the outlet works. A soil-bentonite slurry wall would <br />be constructed near the upstream toe, approximately 40 feet either side of the inlet pipe, <br />and extend down to bedrock. This wall would serve to reduce seepage along the <br />embankment/foundation interface. <br /> <br />The third alternative, reconstruction of the embankment, was selected to remediate the <br />seepage conditions at Douglas Dam. This option is the most rigorous but it provides <br />several benefits the other options do not. It allows for inspection of the outlet works, <br /> <br />22539G/DOUGLAS.DAM 12-17-90IREPORTS3 <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.