Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />II <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Closed Basin division of the San Luis Valley Project was authorized by Public <br /> <br /> <br />Law 92-514, dated October 20, 1972 and modified by Public Law 96-375 (October 3, <br /> <br /> <br />1980) and Public Law 98-570 (October 30, 1984). The major modifications in PL 96- <br /> <br /> <br />375 included the deletion of surface water salvage (as originally proposed in PL <br /> <br /> <br />92-514), and an increase in the size of the ground water salvage area and the number <br /> <br /> <br />of wells to allow the project to achieve the yields previously estimated with <br /> <br /> <br />surf ace water salvage. Public Law 98-570 set as, 300 acre-foot annual limit on <br /> <br /> <br />Closed Basin Project deliveries to the Alamosa and Blanca Wildlife areas. <br /> <br />Construction on the first of the five Closed Basin Project construction stages was <br /> <br /> <br />initiated in 1980. The 10 year construction schedule will allow the design of each <br /> <br /> <br />stage to be refined, if required, on the basis of data collected in t~e <br /> <br /> <br />construction, testing and operation phases of previous stages. Construction is <br /> <br /> <br />expected to be completed in the early 1990's. <br /> <br />V.2 PROJECT PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES <br /> <br />The Project is a response to the Valley's need to develop a reliable source of <br />water which (USBR, 1984): <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Could assist the State of Colorado in meeting its commitments to the States <br /> <br /> <br />of New Mexico and Texas as required by the Rio Grande Compact. <br /> <br /> <br />Could be developed a) without significantly disturbing the existing local <br /> <br /> <br />pattern of water use, b) without disturbing the environment, c) without damage <br /> <br /> <br />to important archeological and historic sites, and d) with minimum adverse <br /> <br /> <br />social and economic effect. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Could enhance recreational opportunities. <br /> <br />4. Could provide wildlife benefits. <br /> <br />V.3 PROJECT FEATURES AND OPERATION <br /> <br />The Closed Basin Project design calls for approximately 170 wells spread out over <br /> <br /> <br />an area of approximately 130,000 acres of sump area (see Closed Basin Division area <br /> <br /> <br />on Figure V-I). The project design calls for the wells to be spaced and pumped at <br /> <br /> <br />a rate so that over the Project area the water table will be lowered by an average <br /> <br />36 <br />