Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II <br />I <br /> <br />USBR Study <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The USBR performed operation studies (USBR, 1955) of a 500,000 af Wagon Wheel Gap <br /> <br /> <br />reservoir. The USBR consideration of the Compact was more limited than the 1938 <br /> <br /> <br />Tipton study since the USBR considered Colorado's Compact deliveries at the <br /> <br /> <br />stateline but did not transpose the effects of Wagon Wheel Gap operation to Rio <br /> <br /> <br />Grande Project Storage. Therefore, an incomplete picture was obtained in this study <br /> <br /> <br />of the impact of Compact provisions on the operation of a Wagon Wheel Gap Reservoir. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The USBR study concluded that the operation of a 500,000 af Wagon Wheel Gap <br /> <br /> <br />Reservoir could provide a regulated average annual (1925-1951) mainstem divert able <br /> <br /> <br />supply of approximately 569,000 af, compared to the estimated average annual (1925- <br /> <br /> <br />1951) mainstem diversions of approximately 539,000 af. The 1925 through 1951 annual <br /> <br /> <br />flows at Del Norte average 643,000 af which is considerably greater than the less <br /> <br /> <br />than 600,000 af of average annual flows for the 1948-1985 period being used in this <br /> <br /> <br />Study. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I I <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />I <br />