Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, I <br />I I <br /> <br />The Compact was signed by the Compact Commissioners of Colorado, New Mexico and <br /> <br /> <br />Texas on March 18, 1938. After ratification by the state legislatures and consent <br /> <br /> <br />of the U.S. Congress, it became effective in 1940. A copy of the Compact is <br /> <br /> <br />included as Appendix B. <br /> <br />IV.2 PURPOSES OF COMPACT <br /> <br />The following two maj or purposes were indicated by Colorado I s original Compact <br />Commissioner, M. C. Hinderlider (1938). <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />To "protect the present and future use of water in the various sections of <br /> <br /> <br />the Rio Grande Basin by setting up schedules of delivery of water at the <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado-New Mexico stateline and at San Marcial, which is at the head of the <br /> <br /> <br />Elephant Butte Reservoir, and by fixing the average annual releases from <br /> <br /> <br />Elephant Butte Reservoir." <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />To "permit the construction and operation of additional reservoirs above <br /> <br /> <br />Elephant Butte Reservoir to regulate the water that is being used at the <br /> <br /> <br />present time, and to capture and make usable, water which otherwise would <br /> <br />spill from Elephant Butte Reservoir and be lost for beneficial use in the <br /> <br />basin. " <br /> <br />IV.3 SUMMARY OF MAJOR COMPACT PROVISIONS AFFECTING NEW STORAGE <br /> <br />The following discussion is of the primary Compact provisions which affect water <br /> <br /> <br />availability to a new storage project in Colorado. Although the Compact establishes <br /> <br /> <br />obligations for both Colorado and New Mexico, the Compact provisions affecting <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado are focused on for this study. <br /> <br />The Colorado-New Mexico stateline Compact obligation is comprised of two parts, <br /> <br /> <br />one applying to the Conejos River (a major tributary of the Rio Grande in Colorado) <br /> <br /> <br />and the other to the Rio Grande mainstem. The separation of the state line <br /> <br /> <br />obligation into two parts was thought to permit the fixing of responsibility for <br /> <br /> <br />any depletion and for the proper allocation of credits resulting from new water <br /> <br />28 <br />