My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00518
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00518
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:27 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:59:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153484
Contractor Name
San Luis Valley Water Conservation District
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
0
County
Rio Grande
Bill Number
FSG
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Flows, surplus to downstream irrigation diversions and the Rio Grande <br /> <br /> <br />Compact, existed in 36 consecutive years of the study period. For tbe <br /> <br /> <br />Alternate Step Two mainstem diversion seenario, no Storable Flood Flows <br /> <br /> <br />oeeurred. <br /> <br />No Debit Storable Flows oeeurred in tbe simulations. The modeling indicated <br /> <br /> <br />that the generally low levels of Rio Grande Project storage during the <br /> <br /> <br />study period required that the captured amounts of Colorado's Compact <br /> <br /> <br />obligation be subsequently released to downstream states. <br /> <br />Tbere are potentially large volumes of Storable Seasonal Flow. The average <br /> <br /> <br />(1948-1985) annual Storable Seasonal Flow ranged from approximately 5,500 <br /> <br /> <br />af to over 90,000 af depending on the assumed efficiency of the direct flow <br /> <br /> <br />irrigation systems, the potential reservoir site, and the mainstem <br /> <br /> <br />diversion scenario. Storable Seasonal Flows were available in greater than <br /> <br /> <br />65 percent of the years studied. <br /> <br />The analyses conducted for this study indicate that the downstream reservoir <br /> <br /> <br />sites, RGl on the Rio Grande and SFl on the South Fork, would have the greatest <br /> <br /> <br />potential for capturing storable flows. The RGl site displays the greatest <br /> <br /> <br />potential of all sites investigated. It should be kept in mind, however, that <br /> <br /> <br />a number of factors in addition to water availability must be considered in the <br /> <br /> <br />selection of a potential reservoir site. These other factors such as <br /> <br /> <br />geotechnical suitability, construction costs and environmental considerations <br /> <br /> <br />were beyond the scope of this study. <br /> <br />x <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.