Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Alternativ ,methods of water application result in varying efficiencies, The application methods assumed here <br />were 30 pe 'cent sprinkler and 70 percent flood irrigation application in Norwood-Redvale and Lilylands and 50 <br />I <br />percent ea ,h sprinkler and flood irrigation in Dry Creek .Basin. The annual irrigation delivery requirements <br />estimated ,r the study area using these methods of application and the projected cropping pattern in Table IV-2 <br />are display d in Table IV-3. <br /> <br />TABLE !Y-3 <br />ESTIMATED ANNUAL IRRIGATION DELIVERY REQUIREMENT <br /> <br /> Project Irrigation <br /> Irrigated Net Diversion Diversion <br /> Area Requirement Requirement <br />Service Ar a I acres) :Iacre-in.!acre) I acre-feet) <br />Norwood- iedvale 12,360 41.5 42,700 <br />Dry Creek Basin 1,180 44,1 4,350 <br />East Lilyla ds 360 51.9 ~ <br />T( al 13,900 48,600 <br /> <br />Munlclnal 'and Industrial Water Demands <br /> <br />The princi al existing municipal and industrial (M & I) demands for project water are from the towns of Norwood <br />and Redva e, which are induded in the Wright's Mesa Rural Water System (WMRWS). The other population <br />centers in he area, the towns of Naturita and Nuda, are lpcated downstream of the primary study area. They <br />obtain mu icipal supplies from the San Miguel River and report no future plans to use San Miguel Project water <br />, , <br />(Personal ~mmunications, August 20 and 21, 1987), <br /> <br />Future po (dation-based demand for project water has been estimated using 1986 per-person consumption data <br />from WM WS and population projections made in accordance with recent growth trends as compiled by the <br />Colorado ivision of Local Government and a planning study specifically for the Norwood area. <br /> <br />!Y-6 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />