Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Dellve~' R lIabllitv Criteria <br /> <br />Streamflow in the study area vary significantly from year to year because of the natural variation in precipitation, <br />In addition runoff occurs in the spring and early summer and may not be available in August and September for <br />irrigation. 11is variation is shown in Figure III-l for Beaver Creek, With improvements to the existing irrigation <br />system suc'as storage reservoirs, delivery variations can be reduced and reliability of irrigation delivery improved, <br /> <br />In the 196 USBR "Feasibility Report - San Miguel Project, Colorado," alternatives were developed to deliver a <br />specified q antity of water 80 percent of the time. That is, with a selected cropping pattern and fixed irrigated <br />area, a full ater supply could be delivered in eight years out of ten to meet or exceed the irrigation demand. In <br />two years ( t of ten, irrigation demands would not be entirely met. Economics generally dictate the reliability <br />criteria to used for a particular irrigation project. Irrigation reliability can generally be increased by increasing <br />the size of torage facilities, however, this increases project costs. Irrigation reliability can also be increased by <br />decreasing he irrigated area. <br /> <br />An 80 perc nt reliability criteria has been used for this study for all crops except a portion of the grass hay/pasture <br />lands. Thi criteria is reasonable considering the selected cropping pattern, area to be irrigated, and irrigation <br />system imp ovement costs. In eight out of ten years, water deliveries would meet or exceed water demand. In <br />those years that water deliveries exceed demand, the excess water could be applied to the (marginally irrigated) <br />grass hay/p ISture which does not get a full water supply 80 percent of the time. In years of excess water, the <br />marginally i rigated crop could be harvested for hay and then grazed. In water short years, the crop could be dry <br />grazed with ut a hay harvest, Figure IV-2 shows this concept graphically for the cropping pattern selected for the <br />Norwood-] edvale area. <br /> <br />]rrinatlon "ater Demands <br /> <br />Optimal cr p growth results when natural precipitation is supplemented with sufficient irrigation water to meet <br />crop water emands (evapotranspiration requirements), referred to as the crop consumptive use requirement. To <br />estimate th total irrigation diversion requirement for a particular area, allowances for application efficiency and <br />conveyance losses in the irrigation system are added to the consumptive use requirement. The total is then <br />adjusted fo return flows or flows intercepted within the irrigation system to arrive at the amount of water which <br />must be div rted at the source to satisfy the crop consumptive use requirement. <br /> <br />N.5 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />