My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00509
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:27 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:58:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153500
Contractor Name
San Miguel Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
San Miguel
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CHAPTER IV . WATER DEMANDS <br /> <br />Water use in the San Miguel study area reflects the agricultural nature of the region with irrigation water <br /> <br />demands accounting for about 98 percent of water usage, In this chapter, historical water use is reviewed. Future <br /> <br /> <br />agricultural water demands are then discussed in terms of a projected cropping pattern, crop water requirements <br /> <br />and irrigation system characteristics. Future municipal and industrial demand projections are presented in terms <br /> <br /> <br />of population and employment projections. <br /> <br />Historical Water Use <br /> <br />Records of historical water use in the project area are very limited, However, a review of the records that are <br /> <br /> <br />available indicates that water deliveries have typically been siguificantly less than crop requirements. That is the <br /> <br /> <br />reason for this study and the reason why facility improvements are needed to increase water delivery capability. <br /> <br />Figure IV -1 shows average historic reservoir operations in the study area based on four years of available records. <br /> <br /> <br />Historic inflows to existing project reservoirs average about 29,000 acre-feet annually and occur mainly in April, <br /> <br />May and June coincident with spring snowmelt runoff. Inflow in July, August and September is minimal. Historic <br /> <br /> <br />reservoir operations have been limited due to diversion intake and ditch conveyance capacities, existing storage <br /> <br /> <br />capacities and runoff volumes in dry years. <br /> <br />The existing reservoirs do help the problem somewhat by storing some early season runoff and releasing this water <br />later in the season to more closely match demand. It can be seen from Figure IV-I, however, that in the months <br />of June, July, August and September that demand far exceeds release capability. Improved diversion, conveyance <br />and storage facilities along with modifications to the existing cropping patterns and improvements in operating <br />and irrigation efficiencies would help provide a more reliable water supply and better meet late season demands. <br /> <br />The existing irrigation facilities (see Figure II-I) and their operation are distinct with each ditch company. A <br />description of the facilities of each ditch company and their operation follows. <br /> <br />The principal components of the Gurley Ditch system, which is owned and operated by the Farmers' Water <br />Development Company, consist of the Gurley Ditch, Gurley Reservoir and Redvale Reservoir, Gurley Ditch <br />diverts water from tributaries of Beaver Creek, conveys the diversions to Gurley Reservoir where they are <br /> <br />IV-I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.