My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00509
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:27 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:58:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153500
Contractor Name
San Miguel Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
San Miguel
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Hvdroloev <br /> <br />Historical streamflows are commonly used in water supply studies as indicators of the streamflows that can <br /> <br /> <br />reasonably be expected in the future. This approach was used for the hydrologic analysis conducted for this study. <br /> <br /> <br />In the San Miguel study area, natural variations in precipitation and runoff produce streamflows which differ <br /> <br /> <br />greatly from year to year. The historical period selected for analysis should represent the typical behavior of the <br /> <br /> <br />streams, but also contain periods of wet and dry years, <br /> <br />The wide year-to-year variations in streamflows in the study area are illustrated by the graph of annual flows for <br /> <br />Beaver Creek near Norwood shown on Figure III- 1. Beaver Creek is used as an example because it is a major <br /> <br />stream and the main source of water supply in the study area at the present time. On the graph, the heights of the <br /> <br /> <br />bars represent the total volume of flow in Beaver Creek which would have passed Norwood in the years 1951 <br /> <br />through 1983 under natural conditions (without diversions). Examination of the graph shows that there have <br /> <br /> <br />been some very wet years such as 1958 and 1983 and some very dry years such as 1953 through 1956 and 1977 <br /> <br /> <br />during this period. <br /> <br />The entire period of 1951 through 1983 was selected as the study period for the hydrologic analysis because of the <br />relatively good availability of required data and because it includes both very wet and very dry periods such as the <br />extended drought of 1953 through 1956. Inclusion of critically low runoff periods is very important for accurately <br />estimating water supplies. The data for these years were the basis for all of the analyses dealing with the water <br />supplied by alternative projects. The primary sources of data were streamflow records from the U.S. Geological <br />Survey (USGS) and ditch diversion records from the State Engineer's Office. <br /> <br />Streamflow in the study area not only varies widely from year to year, it varies widely from month to month. <br />Because snowmelt runoff is the major contributor to streamflow in the area, streamflows are distributed very <br />unevenly throughout the year, The montWy pattern of streamflow typical for the study area is illustrated by the <br />graph of average montWy flows for Beaver Creek near Norwood shown on Figure III- 1. Streamflows jump <br />dramatically in April, peak in June, drop-off significantly in July and remain low for the rest of the year. The <br />average montWy values shown represent streamflow under natural conditions for the years 1951 through 1983. <br />Because of the uneven distribution of streamflow throughout the year, all calculations in the hydrologic analysis <br />were performed on a monthly basis. <br /> <br />III.3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.