Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />.- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Bedrock is essentially horizontal to gently rolling, with notable exceptions in <br /> <br /> <br />the east and west portions of the region. A generalized stratigraphic column <br /> <br /> <br />of the San Miguel region is shown on Drawing 1124-2. The eastern margin of the <br /> <br /> <br />region has been partially influenced by the dome building events of the San <br /> <br /> <br />Miguel and San Juan Mountains, as evidenced by the presence of igneous <br /> <br /> <br />intrusive bodies, merging of the nearly flat-lying beds with structures <br /> <br /> <br />originating to the south and east, and local steepening of some beds (Bush and <br /> <br /> <br />others, 1960). The western end of the region is distinguished by the linear <br /> <br /> <br />graben-like, salt and gypsum-cored collapsed anticlines of Paradox and Gypsum <br /> <br /> <br />valleys, as well as the broad northwesterly-trending, simple folds that flank <br /> <br /> <br />the collapsed salt structures, such as the Dry Creek Basin anticline and <br /> <br /> <br />syncline, the Nucla syncline and an unnamed anticline to the northwest of <br /> <br /> <br />southeast Paradox Valley. <br /> <br />Two groups of potentially active faults are identified as No. 90 and 92 by <br /> <br /> <br />Kirkham and Rogers (1981) of the C.G.S. in the western portion of the region, <br /> <br /> <br />and flank Paradox Valley and Big Gypsum Valley, respectively. These faults are <br /> <br /> <br />located 21 miles or more west and northwest of Cone Reservoir. As these faults <br /> <br /> <br />result from salt flowage and solution, it is unlikely that earthquakes <br /> <br /> <br />generated by these faults would exceed a magnitude of 4 or 5. Movement on many <br /> <br /> <br />of these faults is predicted to occur as creep. It is not known if the <br /> <br /> <br />subsurface faults that initiated the formation and later deformation of the <br /> <br /> <br />salt anticlines are still active. These deep, subsurface faults should be <br /> <br /> <br />thoroughly investigated before any critical or sensitive structures are built <br /> <br /> <br />in this region. <br /> <br />Cone Reservoir is located about 14-17 miles south of some unnamed, late <br /> <br /> <br />Cenozoic-age faults situated on the southwest flank of the Uncompahgre uplift <br /> <br /> <br />which represent the nearest potentially active faults. The most recent <br /> <br /> <br />movement of No. 88 is Quaternary. The peak horizontal acceleration produced at <br /> <br /> <br />the Cone site should not exceed .27g in rock and .26g in stiff soils based on <br /> <br /> <br />estimates of the maximum credible earthquake F;enerated by the potentially <br /> <br /> <br />active fault No. 88 (Kirkham and Rogers, 1981), which is predicted to have a <br /> <br /> <br />magnitude of 6.8. The above estimates basedon published empirical procedures <br /> <br /> <br />by Seed and Idriss (1982), and Slemmons (1977). <br /> <br />-8- <br />